Gruff off topic

[Ming]

Wonderful post, and all fact and no complaining. Not the one I was talking about. Look back in the thread where Ming brings up the past.

Your whole discussion about the need for the gruff forum was tied to the past... So who's kidding who here.

You know Ming, and I know.

Yeah... I know you're lying. Just like most of the revisionist history you keep trying to convince people of.
The good news is, nobody seems to be buying it.
And thanks for providing that link to an old thread. I guess it didn't quite work out the way you thought it would.

I think it's kind of funny that you are performing all the bad things that you want to see gone from this site.

[Sava]

I think it's kind of funny that you are performing all the bad things that you want to see gone from this site.

I was just about to say this.

[self biased]

iIsuggest you also try to do something for the site rather than simply telling us all about how it used to be better in the old days.

frankly, this is advice we all should be following, not just Lancer

[Ming]

I was just about to say this.

Considering he's doing it in the thread set up to promote the new "nicer and friendlier" forum, it's not really the best advertising he could be doing.

[Sava]

Considering he's doing it in the thread set up to promote the new "nicer and friendlier" forum, it's not really the best advertising he could be doing.

I think it's just anger on his part. He sees most everyone crapping all over his new idea. It's failed, for all intents and purposes. Now, he's lashing out like a child... somewhat passive aggressively because he doesn't want to seem like a dick.

For someone who brands himself as a "patriarch", it's pretty hilarious to watch.

[Lancer]

Just came back to share something which really is important with you guys. Augustine just said his first ever sentence! In Visayan, but the translation is: "Finish poop Nanay."

He has never made a sentence before today, has had huge health problems and he's three.

[Sava]

Just came back to share something which really is important with you guys. Augustine just said his first ever sentence! In Visayan, but the translation is: "Finish poop Nanay."

He has never made a sentence before today, has had huge health problems and he's three.

So take his advice and stop ****ting up Poly!

[Ming]

Just came back to share something which really is important with you guys. Augustine just said his first ever sentence! In Visayan, but the translation is: "Finish poop Nanay."

He has never made a sentence before today, has had huge health problems and he's three.

Regardless of anything else... congrats with Augustines first sentence... These are special times.
And good luck with his health problems. There is NOTHING worse for parents than a sick or unhealthy child. May God be with you and your family.

[Ming]

BTW, with this post there are now three times as many posts in this single thread than there is in the entire 'Civilised Forum'...

But remember... these things take time... Rome wasn't built in a Day... It takes many years in Civ to succeed (or do anything if it's CivIII)...

[Sava]

Civ 3

worst civ ever

[kentonio]

Nah, 5 was worst than 3.

[Ming]

III and V... equally bad. They are just both bad in different ways.

BEYOND THE SWORD FOREVER!
(or at least until Civ VI comes out, or hopefully CivBE)

[kentonio]

IV was pretty terrible until BTS came out, it is true.

[Ming]

Civ V is quite fun with all the expansions

I'm surprised to hear that... many don't seem to agree with you, but WTF, maybe it's worth looking at again.

And yes, BTS made Civ IV what it truly is... but it was playable and fun after Warlords.

[Sava]

Civ V is quite fun with all the expansions

This.

5, for me anyways, improved the most between vanilla release and the last DLC.

BTS definitely helped put 4 over the top... but vanilla civ 4 at release was more playable than civ 3 ever was.

Civ3 is far and away the worst... It's not even a question

civ3 ......................... a large gap......................................... other civ titles

I understand 5 is controversial. But at this point, most of the complaining comes from people who either haven't played it at all, or only did for a short time at release and judge the game based on that.