Originally posted by Colon™
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Americans who don't really get the First Amendment
Collapse
X
-
Repeat that again.DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
Comment
-
I thought this thread was about America.Originally posted by kentonio View PostFalsely accusing people of serious crimes has never been protected speech you idiot.
Also, the situation we are discussing has nothing to do with false accusations... but rather, cheeky twitter posts.
Do you enjoy being wrong?To us, it is the BEAST.
Comment
-
Ok, can someone who knows about US law please clear this one up for us. If you falsely accuse someone of being a paedophile in America, is that 'protected free speech'?Originally posted by Sava View PostI thought this thread was about America.
No, that's just what you'd like it to be about. Sally Bercow admitted what she had done and that it was wrong. The only person trying to claim it wasn't an implied accusation that he had commited serious crimes is you.Originally posted by Sava View PostAlso, the situation we are discussing has nothing to do with false accusations... but rather, cheeky twitter posts.
I don't know, I'll let you know when it eventually happens. Twatface.Originally posted by Sava View PostDo you enjoy being wrong?
Comment
-
Nobody falsely accused anyone. Stop with the strawman.Originally posted by kentonio View PostOk, can someone who knows about US law please clear this one up for us. If you falsely accuse someone of being a paedophile in America, is that 'protected free speech'?
She had to because of the consequences. Only an absolute idiot would think her twitter post was an actual accusation. At best, it was a harmless troll.No, that's just what you'd like it to be about. Sally Bercow admitted what she had done and that it was wrong. The only person trying to claim it wasn't an implied accusation that he had commited serious crimes is you.
It's quite apparent that you lack the ability to determine correct from wrong. I'm able to detect your wrongness much better than you. So while I would appreciate your feedback on the matter, it's quite unnecessary.I'll let you know when it eventually happens
Assclown.Twatface.To us, it is the BEAST.
Comment
-
The judge disagreed..Originally posted by Sava View PostNobody falsely accused anyone. Stop with the strawman.
Originally posted by wikiThe judge decided that the Tweet meant "in its natural and ordinary defamatory meaning, that the Claimant was a paedophile who was guilty of sexually abusing boys living in care."[24] With regard to the innuendo of the tweet Mr Justice Tugendhat found that the Tweet carried a meaning "to the same effect" and found that the tweet was "an allegation of guilt. I see no room on these facts for any less serious meaning."An absolute idiot or the legal profession, who seem to think that 'trolling' isn't actually a legally protected thing.Originally posted by Sava View PostShe had to because of the consequences. Only an absolute idiot would think her twitter post was an actual accusation. At best, it was a harmless troll.
Bless.Originally posted by Sava View PostIt's quite apparent that you lack the ability to determine correct from wrong. I'm able to detect your wrongness much better than you. So while I would appreciate your feedback on the matter, it's quite unnecessary.

Gashbotherer.Originally posted by Sava View PostAssclown.
Comment
-
Last edited by self biased; January 20, 2014, 18:05.I wasn't born with enough middle fingers.
[Brandon Roderick? You mean Brock's Toadie?][Hanged from Yggdrasil]
Comment
-
Yes. He is a moron... just like you.Originally posted by kentonio View PostThe judge disagreed..
You see, in America, a country that actually respects free speech, the case would have been dismissed. Because when a person harmlessly trolls, Americans generally understand the troll for what it is.
Just look at yourself. It's pathetic. It's like you are threatened by innuendo. Not only is that disrespectful to the spirit of free speech... but it makes you and your whole country look like a giant bag of pussies.
And I'm not going to insult you if you can't even insult me properly.Gashbotherer.To us, it is the BEAST.
Comment
-
We'll be sure to lose sleep over that.Originally posted by Sava View PostYes. He is a moron... just like you.
You see, in America, a country that actually respects free speech, the case would have been dismissed. Because when a person harmlessly trolls, Americans generally understand the troll for what it is.
Just look at yourself. It's pathetic. It's like you are threatened by innuendo. Not only is that disrespectful to the spirit of free speech... but it makes you and your whole country look like a giant bag of pussies.
Whatever, cumbucket.Originally posted by Sava View PostAnd I'm not going to insult you if you can't even insult me properly.
Comment
-
I think the most important thing to take from this thread is the reminder that you will find stupid people no matter what their politics...
Oh, and that Ben was in agreement with the people that got it wrong...Keep on Civin'
RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O
Comment
Comment