Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Scottish "Independence" manifesto

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by C0ckney View Post
    politicians have, from time to time, being known to be less than honest with the public about tax plans.
    Absolutely true, but it's a little more serious when it's the same politicians that are trying to divide a country. If it goes wrong for Scotland it could go very, very wrong.

    Originally posted by C0ckney View Post
    they're certainly real issues, but i don't see the deception. some of these questions can only be answered by the EU, who, for understandable reasons, prefer to wait until after any vote to give an answer.
    The SNP aren't saying 'we don't know' they're making concrete claims that these things will not be an issue and they are not capable of making that claim honestly.

    Originally posted by C0ckney View Post
    what happens to the bank of england will no doubt be a matter for negotiation if the scots vote yes.
    It's a joke quite frankly. If they want to use the currency but be at the whim of the UK interest rates etc then they can, but the idea that we would give them decision making power on the BoE makes no sense. Why would we? If Scotland is independent why would we give a **** about keeping their economy buoyant if that conflicts with the UK's needs?

    Originally posted by C0ckney View Post
    what is a 'global defence ability' and why would a nation of 5 million odd need it?
    Why would a small nation require the protection of a huge defensive alliance? Why wouldn't they? We have no idea what shape the world is going to be in in decades to come, if there's another big war then how exactly is that little nation of 5 million people going to defend itself again an aggressor without an alliance?

    Originally posted by C0ckney View Post
    what the SNP are proposing seems more than adequate for scotland's defence needs.
    What they are proposing is fine if all they need to do is defend themselves again fishing vessels encroaching on their territorial waters.

    You seem pretty firmly in the Yes camp, and obviously that's your right, but I don't understand how people can take the SNP seriously when they repeatedly and openly lie their asses off about so many issues, and refuse to engage in any way on the negatives. It's all fluffy blue and white clouds and happy dancing in the street, and no care or consideration to the very real issues that an independent nation would face in a time of economic troubles.

    Comment


    • #92
      Fun stuff from the White Paper..

      Originally posted by SNP
      Retain a single UK-wide market for electricity and gas
      Originally posted by SNP
      Create a formal relationship between BBC and SBS to supply the same level of network programming - so Doctor Who and Eastenders would continue.
      Originally posted by SNP
      Ministers say there would be no restrictions on movement in the common travel area between Scotland, the UK, the Republic of Ireland and Isle of Man.
      but..

      Originally posted by SNP
      Maintain free tuition for Scottish students studying in Scotland but charge fees for students from the rest of the UK.
      Brilliant, so they're going to expect the UK to cooperate with anything they need, but when it comes to things that might benefit the UK, they're going to tell us to get ****ed.

      Incidentally, if they think they're going to join the EU then they aren't going to be charging UK citizens for university, as it would contravene EU rules. Let's see what the SNP have to say about that..

      Originally posted by Fast becoming a joke of a party
      “We believe that the unique and unprecedented position of a post-independent Scotland will enable us to continue our current policy in a way which is consistent with the principles of free movement across the EU as a whole and which is compatible with EU requirements.”
      O...k...
      Last edited by kentonio; November 28, 2013, 05:51.

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by kentonio View Post
        You seem pretty firmly in the Yes camp, and obviously that's your right, but I don't understand how people can take the SNP seriously when they repeatedly and openly lie their asses off about so many issues, and refuse to engage in any way on the negatives. It's all fluffy blue and white clouds and happy dancing in the street, and no care or consideration to the very real issues that an independent nation would face in a time of economic troubles.
        Speaking from the Cdn perspective with the Quebec experience - It's not a rational argument/appeal, it is an emotional one.
        "I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
        "I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by Dauphin View Post
          This is predicated on the argument that Scotland currently contributes, and will get in the divorce, 90% of the oil. National assets won't necessarily split that way.
          it's a statement about the present which is backed up by scottish government figures. of course things might be adjusted in some way in any independence negotiations, but saying that oil extracted in scotland's waters is part of scotland's output is completely reasonable.
          "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

          "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
            If the costs of daycare plus the cost of not spending as much time with your kid are less than the cost of missing work you will put your kid in daycare.
            An alternative to subsidized creche or nursery care is the extended family- Granny and Grandad. Worked in my day.
            Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

            ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by pchang View Post
              A bunch of half-naked guys covered in blue paint and waving around swords would be enough to defend Scotland from her enemies.
              William Wallace never covered himself in woad. Please ignore that pile of sh!te 'Braveheart' when discussing Scotland, even when doing so in a jocular fashion. I managed to see the film for free (part of an audience reviewing it) and still wanted my money back.
              Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

              ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by C0ckney View Post
                it's a statement about the present which is backed up by scottish government figures. of course things might be adjusted in some way in any independence negotiations, but saying that oil extracted in scotland's waters is part of scotland's output is completely reasonable.
                Reasonable, but not an empirical state of affairs.
                One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by Dauphin View Post
                  Reasonable, but not an empirical state of affairs.
                  i don't see how anyone can reasonably say that england subsudises scotland, which is what a few people have said in this thread.
                  Last edited by C0ckney; November 29, 2013, 05:23.
                  "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

                  "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by kentonio View Post
                    Absolutely true, but it's a little more serious when it's the same politicians that are trying to divide a country. If it goes wrong for Scotland it could go very, very wrong.
                    my point was that if the scottish government needs to raise more money, there are ways they do so.

                    whether they keep on break any promise is between them and the electorate.

                    The SNP aren't saying 'we don't know' they're making concrete claims that these things will not be an issue and they are not capable of making that claim honestly.
                    not from what i've seen. do have some examples in mind?

                    It's a joke quite frankly. If they want to use the currency but be at the whim of the UK interest rates etc then they can, but the idea that we would give them decision making power on the BoE makes no sense. Why would we? If Scotland is independent why would we give a **** about keeping their economy buoyant if that conflicts with the UK's needs?
                    what they're proposing is a continuation of the present situation in terms of currency and the bank of england. unless there is a significant divergence between the english and scottish economies in the future, i don't see how this would present a problem.

                    Why would a small nation require the protection of a huge defensive alliance? Why wouldn't they? We have no idea what shape the world is going to be in in decades to come, if there's another big war then how exactly is that little nation of 5 million people going to defend itself again an aggressor without an alliance?
                    i'm not convinced that basing defence policy on an unknown threat, from an unknown quarter, at an unknown point in the future, is wise.

                    What they are proposing is fine if all they need to do is defend themselves again fishing vessels encroaching on their territorial waters.
                    that seems a much more likely scenario than the above.

                    You seem pretty firmly in the Yes camp, and obviously that's your right, but I don't understand how people can take the SNP seriously when they repeatedly and openly lie their asses off about so many issues, and refuse to engage in any way on the negatives. It's all fluffy blue and white clouds and happy dancing in the street, and no care or consideration to the very real issues that an independent nation would face in a time of economic troubles.
                    i'm pretty neutral about the whole thing. i'm not scottish after all. in fact if i were scottish i would probably vote no, as i don't think the arguments in favour are that strong. it is though nice to have a discussion here about british politics.

                    there are some good arguments against independence, one or two have been touched upon in this thread. however, i will say though that many of the arguments presented in this debate are of very poor quality and simply the result of a lack of research or clear thinking, and rely on lazy stereotypes.
                    "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

                    "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

                    Comment


                    • [QUOTE=kentonio;6276695]Fun stuff from the White Paper..







                      but..



                      Brilliant, so they're going to expect the UK to cooperate with anything they need, but when it comes to things that might benefit the UK, they're going to tell us to get ****ed.

                      Incidentally, if they think they're going to join the EU then they aren't going to be charging UK citizens for university, as it would contravene EU rules. Let's see what the SNP have to say about that..
                      yes, this is silly and as scotland allows free access to EU students at present, it suggests strongly that they don't really believe that a post-independence policy of charging english, welsh or northern irish students would not contravene EU law.
                      "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

                      "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by C0ckney View Post
                        my point was that if the scottish government needs to raise more money, there are ways they do so.

                        whether they keep on break any promise is between them and the electorate.
                        It's also annoying because the SNP aren't the government of an independent Scotland, elections for that government would take place 2 months after independence. They're basically saying an independent Scotland would look like their party manifesto, which is more than a little cheeky.

                        Originally posted by C0ckney View Post
                        not from what i've seen. do have some examples in mind?
                        Examples of them making claims that they are not able to make? The EU one is a striking example, as is the currency issue.

                        Originally posted by C0ckney View Post
                        what they're proposing is a continuation of the present situation in terms of currency and the bank of england. unless there is a significant divergence between the english and scottish economies in the future, i don't see how this would present a problem.
                        Currently it is in the UK's favour to ensure monetary policy benefits the UK as a whole. Why would we care about acting in an independent Scotland's best interests if those diverged from our own due to their new policy making? Equally why would we allow them any control over interest rates? How would that benefit us in any way? They have no leverage here, which is why they're making not so veiled threats about how they'd just walk away from their share of the national debt if we didn't cooperate. A stupid threat, because they are dependent on us aggreeing to give them a share of assets.

                        Originally posted by C0ckney View Post
                        i'm not convinced that basing defence policy on an unknown threat, from an unknown quarter, at an unknown point in the future, is wise.
                        There have been major wars affecting Europe for more than 2 thousand years. We've had a lull thanks to the post WW2 shape of the world, and unprecedented cooperation between European nations, but to assume the world is now a friendly place is a massive assumption indeed. China are currently sabre waving in the east and it's going to get a lot worse as their power grows, and Russia aren't exactly following a path of democracy right now. We just don't know where the world is going to go in the future and presenting a strong defensive front can prevent things getting out of hand.

                        Originally posted by C0ckney View Post
                        that seems a much more likely scenario than the above.
                        Certainly, but protecting against a future existential threat is not unwise. It's the whole point of the nuclear umbrella after all.

                        Originally posted by C0ckney View Post
                        i'm pretty neutral about the whole thing. i'm not scottish after all. in fact if i were scottish i would probably vote no, as i don't think the arguments in favour are that strong. it is though nice to have a discussion here about british politics.
                        Amen to that.

                        Originally posted by C0ckney View Post
                        yes, this is silly and as scotland allows free access to EU students at present, it suggests strongly that they don't really believe that a post-independence policy of charging english, welsh or northern irish students would not contravene EU law.
                        Yet they still put it in the white paper.

                        Comment


                        • So how are the polls trending?
                          "I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!

                          Comment


                          • Looks like the white paper gave the Yes side an upsurge, but they're still trailing by about 10 points with 15% undecided.

                            Comment


                            • Will the UK be redesigning its flag in the event of Scotland declaring independence?

                              Comment


                              • Doubt it, we'd probably keep it just to annoy them.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X