Originally posted by Hauldren Collider
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Visual Studio 2012 Professional
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostAlso Asher I didn't think 2013 was out yet, just in some sort of beta?
By the way, also awesome: C# and F#, and in particular the way you can have both C# and F# in the same program
And that's not a trait of C# and F# - that's kind of the entire point of .NET. Your languages compile to MSIL which run in the CLR, and then it doesn't matter what language they were written in.
If you're decently skilled, you can do this with any language. The program I'm the lead for has C++, C#, Ruby, and Javascript all in the same program interacting with eachother (on Mac, replace C# with Objective-C)."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
What's your point, Asher? Yes, it's a trait of .NET. That was my point. .NET has really good interop. Interop is the only reason F# is tolerable, and lack of interop is why OCaml is a pointless, stupid language. Yes you can do interop in other ways with disparate languages but it's a pain in the ass and causes problems.
Also ruby sucks massive dick. It's horrible. And Rails is an abomination.
Objective-CIf there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
At some point I'm going to need to learn how to program again. Unless all these whacky languages you guys are talking about are just QBasic by a different name.Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostWhat's your point, Asher? Yes, it's a trait of .NET. That was my point. .NET has really good interop. Interop is the only reason F# is tolerable, and lack of interop is why OCaml is a pointless, stupid language. Yes you can do interop in other ways with disparate languages but it's a pain in the ass and causes problems.
Also ruby sucks massive dick. It's horrible. And Rails is an abomination.
Objective-C
I now am not a fan. I don't hate it, but I've run into so many ****ing bugs with the CLR and .NET libraries and gotchas with interop that it's on my ****list for future implementations."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Originally posted by Asher View PostI used to love .NET. You can probably still find many of my posts raving about it going back a decade.
I now am not a fan. I don't hate it, but I've run into so many ****ing bugs with the CLR and .NET libraries and gotchas with interop that it's on my ****list for future implementations.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostHm. What sort of bugs? And I can't think of any system that does interop better than .NET at the very least.
With interop we have a TON of issues with activation contexts being mismanaged resulting in crashes. Specifically when using pinvoke and COM. They're all seemingly random issues that are impossible to reliably reproduce and MS' dev support was of no help.
I also can't remember the bizarre issue we had with v4 of the CLR (fixed in 4.5) but it took ****loads of dev time to figure out then work around."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
There are two types of Javascript programmers: Those that know Javascript, and those that know better."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
You speak from years of experience with webapp/webOS development?
I've done it myself in the past and my colleagues are trying it now. Using JS to **** around with websites is alright. Using it to write web applications is ****ing retarded if you give a **** at all about performance and memory usage. Which, as it turns out, people care about when running on ****ty ARM processors and 256MB of RAM.
A good read: http://sealedabstract.com/rants/why-...apps-are-slow/"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
Comment