Which government agency is already studying firearms injuries that makes this redundant? I'm guessing the FBI only looks at the ones that occur while committing crimes.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NR-tarded
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by The Mad Monk View PostDoesn't matter to me. We need to reduce costs, and redundant research is wasteful by definition.“As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
"Capitalism ho!"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostYes.
These three things are perfectly reasonable, in my opinion--mostly what I hate are the randomly mandated breaks and severe limitations on working hours during the summer, and most of what I hate about those are the ridiculously high penalties for breaking them (in VERY minor ways) which discourage companies from hiring."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Guynemer View PostUm... are you serious?
So yes, I'm serious, as sad as that is.No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr Strangelove View PostThere is an extensive body of research about the health effects of overworking children - it stunts their growth. Also it was proven long ago that workers are more productive if given short breaks every 2 hours.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Mad Monk View PostWe already have the National Institutes Of Health, OSHA, and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (along with several other administrations of the Department of Transportation) doing them, and that's just a ten minute search.
So yes, I'm serious, as sad as that is.
The more data, the better."My nation is the world, and my religion is to do good." --Thomas Paine
"The subject of onanism is inexhaustable." --Sigmund Freud
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dauphin View PostDo you rate child labour laws favourably?
Follow up in case you said "No".
Would you rather they ALL stay implemented, or they ALL get repealed? (A false dichotomy I know, but it is the same basic binary question asked in the first place).
I ask as I agree with your point, I just want to know why you were ranting. I think we have different focus in our heads when we discuss child labour laws. The latter question highlights this better I would think.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostAt 17, I was finished growing. Can I please work longer than 40 hours if I want more pay? Thanks. And I am capable of taking breaks on my own. It wasn't like my boss wanted to force me to work without stopping--I just wanted the freedom to take breaks when I felt like it, instead of at government-mandates points.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kentonio View PostSo what happens when the kid gets told by their employer that positions like that are incredibly hard to come by, and that while they have the choice to take breaks, there are a dozen other kids out there who would happily work without them. Gee it's still completely your choice of course, but we'll be reviewing your progress very carefully, and we can't guarantee your job will still exist in a few months unless it's completely cost efficient. Etc, etc, etc.
At any rate, the main issue with the breaks rule is the fact that breaking the rule by one minute can result in huuuge fines. They need to be more flexible.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
Comment