Originally posted by The Mad Monk
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Been to Walmart lately?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by kentonio View PostThe idea that a law that was enacted to prevent institutional disenfranchisement of millions of Americans citizens is a 'racial entitlement' is so incredibly offensive that it almost beggars belief.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kidicious View PostAny retail business who can plan shortages has monopoly power. The fact that they are thick with stores only reinforces that claim.No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Mad Monk View PostWhat do you mean, "plan shortages"? Also, I don't mean the area is thick with Walmarts, I mean the area is packed with stores of all types.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Comment
-
Originally posted by kentonio View PostIt still shocks me that one of the highest members of the US judiciary can make a comment like the 'racial entitlements' one and remain in office.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gribbler View PostLifetime appointments are shocking? I guess holding an office for life is a totally alien concept to the British.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kentonio View PostThe idea that a law that was enacted to prevent institutional disenfranchisement of millions of Americans citizens is a 'racial entitlement' is so incredibly offensive that it almost beggars belief.
I don't normally defend Scalia, but I don't think his intent was out of line. The counter argument for maintaining the VRA approvals is that there were past patterns of racial abuse in those areas, so that's enough to justify on on-going oversight, even decades later, without real evidence of on-going abuse.When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."
Comment
-
Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat View PostIt was enacted for that, and I think in fairness to Scalia, his meaning was that the notion that this supervisory overreach that was clearly necessary at the time, should be maintained in perpetuity in some locations but not others, without a demonstrable factual basis. Scalia's judicial philosophy does not accept the notion that there should be open-ended blanket solutions imposed at the federal level for local issues that major or may not exist any more in those locations.
I don't normally defend Scalia, but I don't think his intent was out of line. The counter argument for maintaining the VRA approvals is that there were past patterns of racial abuse in those areas, so that's enough to justify on on-going oversight, even decades later, without real evidence of on-going abuse.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DaShi View Post[ATTACH=CONFIG]173570[/ATTACH]
Bill Maher mentioned this last night on his HBO show
If thats the "racial entitlement" Scalia is talking about, I agree. It is a racial entitlement and its screwing up our system even worse - gerrymandering sucks and good intent dont matter. This shows that to be true, if politicians dont have to worry about protecting minorities in their districts because they lack political clout (enough votes to decide a primary) then we become more polarized. And I'm an extremist albeit old age is moderating my views.
It would be nice if people engaged in the debate rather than throwing bombs at Scalia (who I do not like for other reasons)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Berzerker View PostIf thats the "racial entitlement" Scalia is talking about, I agree. It is a racial entitlement and its screwing up our system even worse - gerrymandering sucks and good intent dont matter. This shows that to be true, if politicians dont have to worry about protecting minorities in their districts because they lack political clout (enough votes to decide a primary) then we become more polarized.
Comment
-
I have never been to WalmartAny views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer. Tis the rising of the moon..
Look, I just don't anymore, okay?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kidicious View PostBy "planned shortages" I mean customers are going to Walmart (not other stores), to buy products. Walmart know full well about how many customers walk through their doors, but have decided not to stock their shelves for all of those customers becuase they make more profit that way.No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alexander's Horse View PostI have never been to Walmart
Yes, that's all one store.
edit: Satellite. Compare to the Sam's Club to the east, which is, curiously, still an empty field at certain magnifications, the Target to the south, and the Nebraska Furniture Mart to the southeast.No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kentonio View PostConsidering the southern states recent moves to cut voting times, introduce unreasonable voter ID requirements and other nefarious attempts to pervert open elections, yes I think it's safe to say there is real evidence of on-going abuse."I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Comment
Comment