Originally posted by regexcellent
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why no thread on the French military intervention in Mali?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostThe French have historically had a very capable military. The whole "french are weak" meme only came about after they got conquered by the Nazis, and let's face it, Russia faced a bigger thrashing than the French ever did, and the only reason they didn't get conquered was because they live in an abominable snowy wasteland and have terrible roads. But no one ever calls Russia weak.When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."
Comment
-
the French were considered to have Europe's finest army in 1940Any views I may express here are personal and certainly do not in any way reflect the views of my employer. Tis the rising of the moon..
Look, I just don't anymore, okay?
Comment
-
Actually no, the French had a number of unfortunate tank designs. Their light tanks were woefully under-armored, under gunned and amazingly not terribly fast for light tanks. Their big tank was terribly slow and it's short barreled main gun was neither a decent artillery piece nor an acceptable anti-tank weapon.
When you compare German and French armor protection on a mm to mm basis it appears that some French tanks were better protected, but German armor was of superior composition. Generally 10 mm of German armor would stop as much ordinance as 15 mm of Allied armor."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!
Comment
-
The French Army had a huge system of fortifications which might have worked had it not been for the fact that they lacked sufficient anti-air guns, they didn't extend across the entire border (including with Belgium and Luxembourg), and they weren't adequately defended in the rear against airborne assault.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr Strangelove View PostActually no, the French had a number of unfortunate tank designs. Their light tanks were woefully under-armored, under gunned and amazingly not terribly fast for light tanks. Their big tank was terribly slow and it's short barreled main gun was neither a decent artillery piece nor an acceptable anti-tank weapon.
When you compare German and French armor protection on a mm to mm basis it appears that some French tanks were better protected, but German armor was of superior composition. Generally 10 mm of German armor would stop as much ordinance as 15 mm of Allied armor.
Originally posted by MOBIUSHmmm, well I thought it was a case of the French using their tanks as infantry support and not in actual armoured units, crap tactics in general and the fact that most/a large number of them lacked radio communication, that was their main downfall.
Originally posted by regexcellent View PostThe French Army had a huge system of fortifications which might have worked had it not been for the fact that they lacked sufficient anti-air guns, they didn't extend across the entire border (including with Belgium and Luxembourg), and they weren't adequately defended in the rear against airborne assault.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat View PostThey don't care. They view the locals as apostates and heretics.Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.
...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915
Comment
-
Originally posted by kentonio View PostBingo. The French were still using tanks pretty much as everyone did in WWI. I did read something a while back that challenges that idea, but the bulk of opinion still supports it.
Rather surprisingly, the Germans used a huge amount of horses in the attack on France. Possibly as potentially edible distractions....Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.
...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915
Comment
-
Originally posted by dannubis View PostThe Germans didn't have to defeat the Maginot line. They went around it.
Originally posted by dannubis View PostIn fact they themselves were surprised their tactics worked.
Comment
-
Hitler repeatedly told his generals to stop the advance of the armored spearheads. Only after it the breakout proved successful he got on the bandwagon.
BTW, the only reason why the BEF got away at Dunkirk is because the Germans decided to listen to Hitler and stop the advance."Ceterum censeo Ben esse expellendum."
Comment
-
Originally posted by dannubis View PostHitler repeatedly told his generals to stop the advance of the armored spearheads. Only after it the breakout proved successful he got on the bandwagon.
Originally posted by dannubis View PostBTW, the only reason why the BEF got away at Dunkirk is because the Germans decided to listen to Hitler and stop the advance.
We tend to view it now though with a lot of hindsight, and this image of an all powerful Germany conquering most of Europe. I think it's important to remember that to the Germans themselves at that time there was a lot of fear and a lot of uncertainty. Hitler was gambling the existence of his country on a war that much of the world thought he couldn't win. Less than 20 years before, the French had occupied the Ruhr and now Germany was taking on not just France but Britain as well. Considering how insanely confident his major strategic moves were, I don't think we can make too much out of him showing a little caution with some of the smaller ones.
Comment
-
He was crazy, and lucky at the same time that Wehrmacht had some exceptional officers under his command. Unfortunate for the rest of the world, and Germany for that matter as well, that the officers were very capable, and that a bunch of lunatics was in charge.
If he had some incapable bozos underneath, like the French military command at the time, Kitler would have gone ahead anyhow, but it would have ended with a lot less bloodshed.Socrates: "Good is That at which all things aim, If one knows what the good is, one will always do what is good." Brian: "Romanes eunt domus"
GW 2013: "and juistin bieber is gay with me and we have 10 kids we live in u.s.a in the white house with obama"
Comment
-
Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat View PostThat was the third time they had their asses handed to them by the Germans in 70 years. Without British intervention in WWI, the French would never have lasted until the US got involved.“I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
- John 13:34-35 (NRSV)
Comment
Comment