Testing for pot is an objective way of weeding people out. Sure a company will weed out some potentially good employees, but overall the people they hire will be better.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Natural gas fracking delayed in Ohio
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostI think the fact that they test for pot is stupid. What do you want me to say? That I think they should bother to test everyone even if they are obviously not pot users? I don't think that. There's no "safety argument" in a grocery store, by the way.When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."
Comment
-
Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat View PostTell that to Worker's Comp insurers. You have forklifts, box cutters, warehousing operations, etc."I hope I get to punch you in the face one day" - MRT144, Imran Siddiqui
'I'm fairly certain that a ban on me punching you in the face is not a "right" worth respecting." - loinburger
Comment
-
Originally posted by MRT144 View PostYou'd have the same issue if he was an alcoholic though. The problem isnt the drugs themselves, its drug abusers and addicts.
So yeah, the problem is abusers and addicts, but employers will take what they can get in terms of tools for weeding out potential risks, no pun intended.
It's also a liability issue, for failure to test in the event that someone screws up when high and causes major injury, death or property damage.When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."
Comment
-
Originally posted by MRT144 View PostAnd yet alcoholics are left to roam the aisles....When all else fails, blame brown people. | Hire a teen, while they still know it all. | Trump-Palin 2016. "You're fired." "I quit."
Comment
Comment