Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

[AWB]Dems prep ground for 2014 Electoral Defeat

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat View Post
    Except we have yet to see any real evidence of behavior that would justify pre-emptive involuntary commitment to a mental health facility.
    The mother is alleged to have been so concerned about his behavior that she warned a former babysitter not to turn his back on him for a moment even to go to the bathroom.
    I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
    For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by DinoDoc View Post
      The mother is alleged to have been so concerned about his behavior that she warned a former babysitter not to turn his back on him for a moment even to go to the bathroom.
      If that's from previous behaviours he exhibited, then the problem isn't the mental health system per se, it's that there is no trust in the system so families won't interact with it. If people won't report the dangerous behaviours then there is a huge cultural problem that needs to be overcome. And becoming the more restrictive the society becomes on managing those behaviours will only decrease the likelihood of family members from assisting society in policing those dangerous individuals.

      tl;dr: becoming more restrictive is more likely to lead to more damage, not less.
      You just wasted six ... no, seven ... seconds of your life reading this sentence.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Krill View Post
        tl;dr: becoming more restrictive is more likely to lead to more damage, not less.
        We haven't been restrictive as a society wrt the mentally ill since the late 70's.
        I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
        For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

        Comment


        • #49
          Says the person advocating locking people up.
          You just wasted six ... no, seven ... seconds of your life reading this sentence.

          Comment


          • #50
            I thought one of the big complaints the left had against Reagan is that he shut down the mental hospitals leads to loads of mentally ill homeless out on the streets, which contributed to crime.
            “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.â€
            - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Krill View Post
              Says the person advocating locking people up.
              That would tend to lead to the conclusion we aren't doing that or there would be no reason for me to argue for relaxed civil commitment standards.
              I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
              For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

              Comment


              • #52
                Boehner says he'll take Biden's commission "under advisement" and would not say that gun control is "on the table" in front of reporters. Dead dead dead. That didn't last long.

                Of course it's not stopping the panic.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat View Post
                  Uhh, she's not elected by San Francisco.
                  She started her political career being the Mayor of SF, which has severely influenced her stance on gun politics. After all, SF is the same city that voted by popular initiative to ban firearms from city limits.

                  It's not like the California Republican Party tries real hard to win statewide elections here. I mean, Meg Whitman and Carly Fiorina? WTF is that? And they're the top tier of candidates that the Republican party scrapes up here.
                  Yeah, and a lot of firearm owners have just written off the entire state. Throwing 1/10th of the population to the wolves isn't a good way to seek sane gun policy at the national level.
                  Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Here are the specifics of Feinsteins proposed AWB

                    Drink it in boys,

                    Including such winning provisions as

                    Strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and various state bans by:

                    -Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test

                    -Eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressors from the characteristics test

                    -Banning firearms with “thumbhole stocks†and “bullet buttons†to address attempts to “work around†prior bans
                    And

                    Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act, to include:

                    -Background check of owner and any transferee;

                    -Type and serial number of the firearm;

                    -Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint;

                    -Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate State or local law; and

                    -Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration
                    Haha, holy ****. "Come up with the $$$ for a NFA trust, your semautomatic longarm is now exactly the same as a Machine gun as far as I'm concerned".
                    Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      That has almost a 0% chance of passing through Congress.
                      If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                      ){ :|:& };:

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        The NFA can barely handle all the new SBRs and suppressors. I'd love to see what kind of crazy ****show it would be with millions of rifles getting registered at once

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          The repubs are going to continue to do well in bi year elections simply because they gerrymandered house districts at the state level to hell and back.
                          Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                            That has almost a 0% chance of passing through Congress.
                            No ****, she's obviously aiming high and expecting to hit low.
                            Today, you are the waves of the Pacific, pushing ever eastward. You are the sequoias rising from the Sierra Nevada, defiant and enduring.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Watch as they bring it to the floor in its current state and proclaim "Welp, we tried."

                              She's aiming high in order in the hope that she'll hit anywhere. There's just no percentage for the Republicans to vote for gun control. It is literally the biggest wedge issue out there, with the added benefit that gun owners are way more likely to vote on it than non-gun owners.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by Dinner View Post
                                The repubs are going to continue to do well in bi year elections simply because they gerrymandered house districts at the state level to hell and back.
                                Was it the Republicans who did this to my state? Or is it possible that both sides are guilty of gerrymandering?
                                John Brown did nothing wrong.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X