Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obamacare vs Supreme Court Round 2: This time its personal?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 12
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 8 9 10 11 12 template Next
  • #166
    Originally posted by gribbler View Post
    There is no need for drone strikes in the UK
    Agree to disagree
    "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

    “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

    Comment

    • #167
      Originally posted by snoopy369 View Post
      "get rid of all of these people who we don't like".
      you mean, it wasn't that to begin with?
      I wasn't born with enough middle fingers.
      [Brandon Roderick? You mean Brock's Toadie?][Hanged from Yggdrasil]

      Comment

      • #168
        Originally posted by gribbler View Post
        They need to have good evidence that the strike will hit a terrorist. Also, the local government needs to be unable or unwilling to cooperate in apprehending the terrorist by less violent means. There is no need for drone strikes in the UK because the UK has a responsible government.
        Good point, but as long as the US relies on employers for health insurance, there can't be any real healthcare reform.
        “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
        "Capitalism ho!"

        Comment

        • #169
          Originally posted by DinoDoc View Post
          Well to be fair in the case of the Yemen strike, the target in question was involved in the "work place violence" at Fort Hood.
          To be fair the man who shot up Fort Hood was above all things just a ****ing loser. IIRC he tried to get in contact with terrorist organizations but they thought he was either a plant or just plain worthless. They told him to GTFO.

          Comment

          • #170
            Originally posted by regexcellent View Post
            To be fair the man who shot up Fort Hood was above all things just a ****ing loser. IIRC he tried to get in contact with terrorist organizations but they thought he was either a plant or just plain worthless. They told him to GTFO.
            The shooter had more than a tangential connection with Anwar al-Aulaqi
            I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
            For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

            Comment

            • #171
              Yes. One reason on top of many to knock off al-Awlaki. But I'm pretty sure that was after he was rejected as a jihadist elsewhere.

              Comment

              Previous 1 2 8 9 10 11 12 template Next
              Working...
              X