Who is going to win?

[Dinner]

I think my ass hole could squirt fecal matter all over Tupac for several hours and it would not only improve his looks but it would improve his intelligence. The ****er is so dumb he needs a good squirt of diarrhea.

[Hauldren Collider]

Are you saying black people look like ****, you racist?

[Tupac Shakur]

I just about tubgirled this thread in protest of Oerdin's racism and fecophilia, but thought better of it. It's not worth it.

[-Jrabbit]

Very restrained. And thanks.

[Uncle Sparky]

WAD would be better.

Just sayin'.

If you've never WAP'd with a Wang, you don't know what your missing.

[MrFun]

I can see a growing number of women voting for Romney, and for Republican congresspersons now, in light of stuff like this:

[regexcellent]

In case you didn't notice 1) Mitt Romney is not Richard Mourdock, 2) Richard Mourdock's statement is not as unreasonable as the left is making it out to be, and 3) STOP COPY-PASTING IMAGES YOU SEE ON YOUR FACEBOOK FEED!

[kentonio]

Yes it is as unreasonable as it's being made out to be!! The GOP seem to have convinced themselves that people misunderstood what he was saying and thought he was saying 'rape = good'. No, we can understand simple English sentences and understand exactly the point he was making, WHICH WAS ****ING DISGUSTING ENOUGH ALREADY!

Telling women that they should have their rapists babies is so revoltingly cruel that it literally puts into question whether the person suggesting it should continune to be classified as a human being. Richard Mourdock is a repulsively insensitive man, and as Romney refuses to disavow him, so is Romney.

[kentonio]

New Ohio polls btw..

[regexcellent]

The baby isn't at fault for the rape.

[giblets]

I think my ass hole could squirt fecal matter all over Tupac for several hours and it would not only improve his looks but it would improve his intelligence. The ****er is so dumb he needs a good squirt of diarrhea.

You make me look normal.

New Ohio polls btw..

[ATTACH=CONFIG]172834[/ATTACH]

The robot pollsters are the only ones who manage to find Romney in the lead.

[giblets]

The baby isn't at fault for the rape.

That's obvious given that an embryo is completely incapable of any sort of agency.

Yes it is as unreasonable as it's being made out to be!! The GOP seem to have convinced themselves that people misunderstood what he was saying and thought he was saying 'rape = good'. No, we can understand simple English sentences and understand exactly the point he was making, WHICH WAS ****ING DISGUSTING ENOUGH ALREADY!

Telling women that they should have their rapists babies is so revoltingly cruel that it literally puts into question whether the person suggesting it should continune to be classified as a human being. Richard Mourdock is a repulsively insensitive man, and as Romney refuses to disavow him, so is Romney.

Rapists are actually able to sue for custody and visitation rights in a majority of states so maybe this won't cost him the election after all.

[-Jrabbit]

Richard Mourdock's statement is not as unreasonable as the left is making it out to be

Please, do tell us the "not unreasonable" part. That it's just his faith, so logic need not be included? That it was just a cynical attempt to win votes (as indicated by his follow-up statements), so he gets a pass?

BTW, upwards of 70% of Americans (83% according to CNN in August) support continued legality of abortion in cases of rape and incest.

[snoopy369]

The 'not unreasonable' part is that if you start from the belief that life is sacred, always, and that an embryo is alive from conception, that it's not okay to kill it even if there are really extenuating circumstances. As I've said elsewhere, I have a lot more respect for pro-life folks who believe this than those that are pro-life except in the case of rape/incest; either you believe in it or you don't, the in-the-middle scenario to me is hypocritical.

I do agree that the right is of course miscasting the left's stance as well; that, of course, is just normal politics

[kentonio]

I think there should be a new rule, that before a politician can propose things like that, that they should have to sit down with a rape victim and explain to them why they should not have control over their body for the next nine months.

Rapists are actually able to sue for custody and visitation rights in a majority of states so maybe this won't cost him the election after all.

That kind of stuff makes me angry to the point of wanting to say things that would certainly get me banned/arrested.