How can you claim Romney is doing better at fundraising when Obama has raised more money than Romney? What standard do you use for "better?"
It's a stupid standard anyway: if one's expenditures of funds is ineffective, then the ability to raise them is completely irrelevant to the campaign.
It's a stupid standard anyway: if one's expenditures of funds is ineffective, then the ability to raise them is completely irrelevant to the campaign.
Comment