Originally posted by Hauldren Collider
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		Announcement
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	
		
			
				No announcement yet.
				
			
				
	
World’s richest woman would prefer to pay her miners $2 a day
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	X
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 This is incoherent. Perhaps you can elaborate on what the word "pers" means? Did you mean "peers"? And the plural second person possessive in English is "their", which is frequently confused with the homophonic adverb "there", but the difference is crucial.Originally posted by a.kitman View Post**** off and tellme why your pers like to show there buttcrack.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
  ){ :|:& };: ){ :|:& };:
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 If Australia's global competitiveness is so hurting why is that Australia is the one developed nation which hasn't experienced recession during the past 5 years?Originally posted by Tupac Shakur View PostThat wasn't her point. Her point was that the cost of production is extremely high in Australia for a variety of reasons, including the high cost of labor, and it's hurting the global competitiveness of Australia-based mining companies. That's a totally valid criticism.
 Australia's main mineral export is iron, not gold, and China, Japan, and South Korea buy plenty of it. South Africa's iron production is tiny compared to Australia's, they're not even remotely a threat to Australia's dominance of the international iron trade."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 
 Africans want to work, and its workers are willing to work for less than $2 per day
 
 
 What a retarded argument we hear all the time from the conservative side.
 
 That people are willing to work for 2 bucks a day doesn't prove that this is what they want, merely that resources are scarce.In Soviet Russia, Fake borises YOU.
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 I say she should go for it and invest in a mine in Africa. Of course, if it was such a great idea then everyone in the mining business would be doing it and I suspect the political instability of most 3rd world countries is what deters them just like the relative stability (and rule of law) in places like Australia is what makes the relatively expensive countries still attractive for investment.
 
 After her mine in Zimbabwe gets nationalized without compensation she just might figure out why no one else was bothering to invest there despite the seemingly larger profits which could be made from a mine there.Last edited by Dinner; September 9, 2012, 01:32.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Yah, those immoral Australian workers should be doing everything in their power to demand more compensationOriginally posted by Tupac Shakur View PostGreed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right. Greed works. Greed clarifies, cuts through, and captures, the essence of the evolutionary spirit. Greed, in all of its forms; greed for life, for money, for love, knowledge, has marked the upward surge of mankind and greed, you mark my words, will not only save Hancock Prospecting, but that other malfunctioning corporation called Australia. :greedisalwaysgood: :greedisalwaysgood:
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Rinehart is simply pointing out that the current Australian government has reduced Australia's competitiveness by a large margin. The same observations have been made by a former Labor minister, Keith De Lacy:
 
 "You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."--General Sir Charles James Napier
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Andrew Bolt summarises the claptrap around this argument.
 
 "You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."--General Sir Charles James Napier
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Didn't you read what she said? They WANT to work for $2/day!Originally posted by Dinner View PostI say she should go for it and invest in a mine in Africa. Of course, if it was such a great idea then everyone in the mining business would be doing it and I suspect the political instability of most 3rd world countries is what deters them just like the relative stability (and rule of law) in places like Australia is what makes the relatively expensive countries still attractive for investment.
 
 After her mine in Zimbabwe gets nationalized without compensation she just might figure out why no one else was bothering to invest there despite the seemingly larger profits which could be made from a mine there. I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator? I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
 - Justice Brett Kavanaugh
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 It is a strange and unfortunate turn to see a man describe another man as such, and think himself as having won the argument. Bolt's partisanship, supposing that he were possessed of it, has nothing to do with the substance of his argument or views. Answer them and there will be some benefit from this discussion.Originally posted by Kidicious View PostWhat a partisan hack."You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."--General Sir Charles James Napier
 Comment
- 
	
	
	
		
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Originally posted by Zevico View PostIt is a strange and unfortunate turn to see a man describe another man as such, and think himself as having won the argument. Bolt's partisanship, supposing that he were possessed of it, has nothing to do with the substance of his argument or views. Answer them and there will be some benefit from this discussion.
 I don't know what substance you are talking about. Those in the government were saying that she was complaining about the high wages in Austrailia. When you state the miners in Africa get paid $2/day you should expect people to have that belief. Anyone who says otherwise is partisan.I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
 - Justice Brett Kavanaugh
 Comment


Comment