So let me get this straight--you think that we shouldn't have abortions, but they are okay for rape? Are children of rape somehow less of a person than other children?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
News about the female body
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostSo let me get this straight--you think that we shouldn't have abortions, but they are okay for rape? Are children of rape somehow less of a person than other children?
also known as "Pro Choice, not Pro Abortion"
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostSo let me get this straight--you think that we shouldn't have abortions, but they are okay for rape? Are children of rape somehow less of a person than other children?
And a fetus cannot ever be a child anyway, if the fetus is aborted.A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Mad Monk View Post
Akin needs to go.
Anyway, I found this article and wanted to share it here when I saw you posted the video clip above.A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostSo let me get this straight--you think that we shouldn't have abortions, but they are okay for rape? Are children of rape somehow less of a person than other children?Graffiti in a public toilet
Do not require skill or wit
Among the **** we all are poets
Among the poets we are ****.
Comment
-
I don't see how he is wrong.
JM
(Of course, doesn't excuse Akin's craziness and might mean that many of those who think similarly to me do so for the wrong reasons.)Jon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
Comment
-
The whole rape/incest thing is a canard. The real question has always been about whether unborn babies count as people or not. If you think that they do, then that should be true regardless of how or with whom the baby was conceived.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jon Miller View PostI don't see how he is wrong.
1. The person supporting the clause wants to punish promiscuous women with an abortion ban, and since victims of rape aren't at fault for being pregnant then it's okay for them to have abortions. The welfare of the unborn child is irrelevant. For example, on the topic of a rape/incest exception clause, Slowwhand saysOriginally posted by SlowwHand View PostThere are generally medical signs indicating rape. As a pro-lifer, I support [abortion in the case of rape]. Why penalize a woman while also expanding deviant genes/behavior?<p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures</p>
Comment
-
I enjoy the correlation of people who are all about FREEEEEDDDDDOM and the people who wish to revoke a woman's right to choose.
Sometimes, thinking is hard for some people."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Originally posted by Asher View PostI enjoy the correlation of people who are all about FREEEEEDDDDDOM and the people who wish to revoke a woman's right to choose.
Sometimes, thinking is hard for some people.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Originally posted by loinburger View PostI've seen two broad justifications for an "abortion is permissible in the case of rape/incest" clause:
1. The person supporting the clause wants to punish promiscuous women with an abortion ban, and since victims of rape aren't at fault for being pregnant then it's okay for them to have abortions. The welfare of the unborn child is irrelevant. For example, on the topic of a rape/incest exception clause, Slowwhand says
2. The person supporting the clause is not 100% certain that their opposition to abortion is correct. Just to make some numbers up, let's say that you're only 95% certain that your opposition to abortion is correct - in that case you're willing to allow an exception to a ban if the mother's life is at risk. If you're 80% certain that your opposition to abortion is correct then you're willing to allow an exception for rape. If you're 60% certain then you don't oppose a ban, though you do oppose state insurance coverage for abortion. Etc.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostSuch as you. As I (and many others) have repeatedly explained, this is not about a woman's right to choose but whether or not we consider a fetus to be a moral person.
A sensible, intelligent person recognizes that to force your own beliefs on another person is quite wrong - especially through Big Government.
It's a woman's body, it's a woman's choice.
I take a utilitarian approach to the matter. If you use contraception, a baby isn't born. If you get an abortion, a baby isn't born. Either way a potential person is not being born.
As a utilitarian, I also understand if we outlawed abortions:
1) They'd still happen, but in dark backrooms with sketchy "doctors"
2) It'd flood the already burgeoning State-run foster homes/orphanages. Children from this background are statistically far more likely to become criminals or other form of societal leaches.
3) It'd force people not mature enough or ready enough to raise children. This will lead to more poverty, and children raised in this kind of environment are also far more likely to become a societal leach.
So, as you can see, even the economics of the situation back me up on this. Don't you want the government to be smaller, HC? If so, why do you want the government to raise so many children?
You can "explain" all you want, but know that it is not a rational explanation. YOU believe that human life begins as soon as sperm fertilizes egg. YOU wish to force YOUR belief on others using the GOVERNMENT. This is not a logically consistent argument with someone who favours less government intervention."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
You know, if you want to engage in masturbatory activities, the internet also features a great abundance and variety of pornography...
Comment
Comment