Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Olympic medals

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by MOBIUS View Post
    Wales' relative medal haul if it had the population of the US:

    307 Gold
    307 Silver
    102 Bronze

    Not bad I guess...

    WALES! WALES! WALES!

    Anyone care to calculate Baltimore's medal count if they had the population of the US?
    No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by rah View Post
      True, but the automatic qualifying on some events doesn't hurt.
      Have any examples of a medal won by an automatic qualifier?

      I don't see how "doesn't hurt" = "All about home team advantage (having more participants than any other country)"

      I would guess GB will get between the Beijing and London final tally in Rio. Golds will become Silvers logic. Not Brass to Muck.
      One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by The Mad Monk View Post
        Anyone care to calculate Baltimore's medal count if they had the population of the US?
        What would Phelps medal count be if he was the population of the US?

        BILLIONS!!!!
        One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

        Comment


        • #34
          No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Dauphin View Post
            Have any examples of a medal won by an automatic qualifier?
            Actually the real question is whether the automatic qualifier would have qualified anyway and since they don't have to, you really can't say for sure. We have witnessed strange things in the past.

            Yes, it happens a lot. Especially in the 96 games hosted in Atlanta. The Men's basketball team won gold. (yes the would have probably qualified anyway ) There were quite a few examples that year. I'm sure the same could be said whenever the games were in Russia or China.



            I don't see how "doesn't hurt" = "All about home team advantage (having more participants than any other country)"
            I never said they were =. But it's one of the reason you have more participants.


            I would guess GB will get between the Beijing and London final tally in Rio. Golds will become Silvers logic. Not Brass to Muck.
            Yes, I expect the total to be somewhere in between also. Especially since Beijing was so bad and London was so sweet.
            It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
            RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

            Comment


            • #36
              Well, going to be interesting when golf is added next go round.. Amateurs will not have a chance against the pros.

              Comment


              • #37
                Yeah, I think the golf will be fun to watch. Rhythmic Gymnastics made me want to pluck my eyeballs out.
                It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by rah View Post
                  Yes, I expect the total to be somewhere in between also. Especially since Beijing was so bad and London was so sweet.
                  What is your definition of bad exactly? In Beijing GB got 19 golds - their second best Olympic performance up til then.

                  In Atlanta GB got 1 gold; After 1920 and before 2000 GB never got more than 10 golds in a single Olympics.
                  One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by rah View Post
                    Actually the real question is whether the automatic qualifier would have qualified anyway and since they don't have to, you really can't say for sure. We have witnessed strange things in the past.
                    Sorry, I took that for a given....I was referring to those who only qualified because it was automatic.
                    One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Dauphin View Post
                      What is your definition of bad exactly? In Beijing GB got 19 golds - their second best Olympic performance up til then.

                      In Atlanta GB got 1 gold; After 1920 and before 2000 GB never got more than 10 golds in a single Olympics.
                      I class Beijing as absolutely our best Olympic performance by far (before 2012), 1908 was a completely different era and home advantage and being able to field people in all events really was a game changer. Unlike now.
                      Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
                      Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
                      We've got both kinds

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        For anyone other than the US or China (or maybe Russia), 4th in the Medal table is an amazing success.
                        Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
                        Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
                        We've got both kinds

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by The Mad Monk View Post
                          Here's my quibble:

                          If synchronized swimming is an Olympic sport, why isn't cheerleading?
                          If they were to add cheerleading then they might as well add porn events.
                          "I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Docfeelgood View Post
                            Well, going to be interesting when golf is added next go round.. Amateurs will not have a chance against the pros.
                            OK, if they're adding golf then they might as well add porn events.
                            "I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Aeson View Post
                              Also they beat our basketball team (fairly for once!) forcing us to Jordan their ass.
                              We did that, mostly
                              Originally posted by Serb:Please, remind me, how exactly and when exactly, Russia bullied its neighbors?
                              Originally posted by Ted Striker:Go Serb !
                              Originally posted by Pekka:If it was possible to capture the essentials of Sepultura in a dildo, I'd attach it to a bicycle and ride it up your azzes.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by MikeH View Post
                                I class Beijing as absolutely our best Olympic performance by far (before 2012), 1908 was a completely different era and home advantage and being able to field people in all events really was a game changer. Unlike now.
                                I agree it's an outlying and misleading data point, didn't want to seem to be cherry-picking though.
                                One day Canada will rule the world, and then we'll all be sorry.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X