Originally posted by kentonio
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Falkland Islanders to hold referendum over sovereignty
Collapse
X
-
I'm sure wikipedia is the best source of information regarding international arms sales.
-
We'd need to get to the islands to make it cost to them, and I don't think we can even do that.
Leave a comment:
-
Jesus Christ you guys have poor reading comprehension skills.
HOWS THAT?!You don't need to hold the islands. You just need to make it cost the Brits a few billion pounds.
Leave a comment:
-
Really, it's the opposite, by threatening stuff like that, there would never be a war.Originally posted by MRT144 View PostGet your war boner on.
Leave a comment:
-
Anything we put in the air will probably be in the air because it was burning in the ground a moment before. (This probably also applies, partly at least, to our civil airliners)Originally posted by kentonio View PostAnything they put in the air would be burning on the ground before it got anywhere near our shipping,
Jon: 20 years ago, probably. We even were this close to going to war with them (there's mined passes over the andes, on both sides, even today) over some glorified rocks around cape horn. I don't think even Uruguay is worried about us invading them. At least, I think they're more worried about all the argentine tourists, and these past couple of years haven't been good...
Leave a comment:
-
I guess it depends on what you mean by "serious". In the greater scheme of things Argentina is a flea bite of a challenge for the Brits. As usual, the logistics could be a strain for any type of lengthy operations, but the U.S. would make sure they had what they need.Originally posted by snoopy369 View PostI think Sava is suggesting guerilla tactics rather than an invasion. I don't know that Argentina has the desire, not to mention capability, to do something like that; but his point is valid, that if they really wanted to, they probably could do some serious damage to the Falklands and/or British shipping interests. Of course, then Britain could just invade Buenos Aires...
Leave a comment:
-
My impression from Chile is that they are more concerned about you invading them.Originally posted by N35t0r View PostThey'd invade us if they were nice guys
I don't think Chile or Brazil would ever invade. First, it's a logistical nightmare, and second, we're still Brazil's third largest trade partner, even after the heavy restrictions set by our government for the past couple of years.
JM
Leave a comment:
-
His guerilla tactics all seem to stem from the idea of Argentinians making it to the islands in the first place.
Leave a comment:
-
I think Sava is suggesting guerilla tactics rather than an invasion. I don't know that Argentina has the desire, not to mention capability, to do something like that; but his point is valid, that if they really wanted to, they probably could do some serious damage to the Falklands and/or British shipping interests. Of course, then Britain could just invade Buenos Aires...
Leave a comment:
-
Also Argentina doesn't have Sunburns.
Originally posted by WikiCurrent Operators
People's Republic of China
Russia
Vietnam
India
Iran
Leave a comment:
-
I think you are missing my point. Any hypothetical Argentinian invasion force could be crippled by British forces already deployed.Originally posted by Sava View PostYou also can't land amphibious IFV's from a submarine. Some LCS is going to have to get close to the shore to support any serious landing. Small teams are perfectly capable of neutralizing static launch sites and intercepting larger mobile platforms. But at 400 lbs, you could launch an ASM from small truck or SUV.
How about every single technical?
Hell, you could rig a Russian Sunburn in a structure the size of a McDonald's.
Good luck shooting down that at Mach 3.
Leave a comment:
-
Sava, there is basically no way they could even get to the islands. Our air superiority would be absolute, and I'm not saying that because of nationalistic bias. Anything they put in the air would be burning on the ground before it got anywhere near our shipping, and no landing craft would get anywhere near the islands. If they did manage to sneak a commando squad to the islands there's a large garrison of marines who would stop that invasion dead in the water. It's just not a plausible scenario any more.
Leave a comment:
-
You don't need to hold the islands. You just need to make it cost the Brits a few billion pounds.Originally posted by N35t0r View PostIf we tried now, we wouldn't even get to the islands. And if we did, we'd probably stumble upon one of the minefields we so graciously left behind.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: