Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Falkland Islanders to hold referendum over sovereignty

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sava
    replied
    Originally posted by kentonio View Post
    Also Argentina doesn't have Sunburns.
    I'm sure wikipedia is the best source of information regarding international arms sales.

    Leave a comment:


  • N35t0r
    replied
    We'd need to get to the islands to make it cost to them, and I don't think we can even do that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sava
    replied
    Jesus Christ you guys have poor reading comprehension skills.


    You don't need to hold the islands. You just need to make it cost the Brits a few billion pounds.
    HOWS THAT?!

    Leave a comment:


  • Hauldren Collider
    replied
    Originally posted by MRT144 View Post
    Get your war boner on.
    Really, it's the opposite, by threatening stuff like that, there would never be a war.

    Leave a comment:


  • N35t0r
    replied
    Originally posted by kentonio View Post
    Anything they put in the air would be burning on the ground before it got anywhere near our shipping,
    Anything we put in the air will probably be in the air because it was burning in the ground a moment before. (This probably also applies, partly at least, to our civil airliners)

    Jon: 20 years ago, probably. We even were this close to going to war with them (there's mined passes over the andes, on both sides, even today) over some glorified rocks around cape horn. I don't think even Uruguay is worried about us invading them. At least, I think they're more worried about all the argentine tourists, and these past couple of years haven't been good...

    Leave a comment:


  • PLATO
    replied
    Originally posted by snoopy369 View Post
    I think Sava is suggesting guerilla tactics rather than an invasion. I don't know that Argentina has the desire, not to mention capability, to do something like that; but his point is valid, that if they really wanted to, they probably could do some serious damage to the Falklands and/or British shipping interests. Of course, then Britain could just invade Buenos Aires...
    I guess it depends on what you mean by "serious". In the greater scheme of things Argentina is a flea bite of a challenge for the Brits. As usual, the logistics could be a strain for any type of lengthy operations, but the U.S. would make sure they had what they need.

    Leave a comment:


  • MRT144
    replied
    Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
    You know, if the Argentinians do attack the Falklands again, you could always invoke article 5 of NATO...If I were Argentina, that would make me very leery of saber rattling.
    Get your war boner on.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jon Miller
    replied
    Originally posted by N35t0r View Post
    They'd invade us if they were nice guys

    I don't think Chile or Brazil would ever invade. First, it's a logistical nightmare, and second, we're still Brazil's third largest trade partner, even after the heavy restrictions set by our government for the past couple of years.
    My impression from Chile is that they are more concerned about you invading them.

    JM

    Leave a comment:


  • snoopy369
    replied
    Kon-Tiki anyone?

    Leave a comment:


  • kentonio
    replied
    His guerilla tactics all seem to stem from the idea of Argentinians making it to the islands in the first place.

    Leave a comment:


  • snoopy369
    replied
    I think Sava is suggesting guerilla tactics rather than an invasion. I don't know that Argentina has the desire, not to mention capability, to do something like that; but his point is valid, that if they really wanted to, they probably could do some serious damage to the Falklands and/or British shipping interests. Of course, then Britain could just invade Buenos Aires...

    Leave a comment:


  • kentonio
    replied
    Also Argentina doesn't have Sunburns.

    Originally posted by Wiki
    Current Operators

    People's Republic of China
    Russia
    Vietnam
    India
    Iran

    Leave a comment:


  • Hauldren Collider
    replied
    Originally posted by Sava View Post
    You also can't land amphibious IFV's from a submarine. Some LCS is going to have to get close to the shore to support any serious landing. Small teams are perfectly capable of neutralizing static launch sites and intercepting larger mobile platforms. But at 400 lbs, you could launch an ASM from small truck or SUV.

    How about every single technical?

    Hell, you could rig a Russian Sunburn in a structure the size of a McDonald's.

    Good luck shooting down that at Mach 3.
    I think you are missing my point. Any hypothetical Argentinian invasion force could be crippled by British forces already deployed.

    Leave a comment:


  • kentonio
    replied
    Sava, there is basically no way they could even get to the islands. Our air superiority would be absolute, and I'm not saying that because of nationalistic bias. Anything they put in the air would be burning on the ground before it got anywhere near our shipping, and no landing craft would get anywhere near the islands. If they did manage to sneak a commando squad to the islands there's a large garrison of marines who would stop that invasion dead in the water. It's just not a plausible scenario any more.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sava
    replied
    Originally posted by N35t0r View Post
    If we tried now, we wouldn't even get to the islands. And if we did, we'd probably stumble upon one of the minefields we so graciously left behind.
    You don't need to hold the islands. You just need to make it cost the Brits a few billion pounds.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X