It's the Turing Test.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is it Ethical to Program an Intelligent Robot So that it Will Want to Be Your Slave?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostIt's the Turing Test."I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration somehow you're not patriotic. We should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with any administration." - Hillary Clinton, 2003
Comment
-
Originally posted by PLATO View PostWell...yes, but didn't Turing himself comment on the the fact that the test measured a machine's ability to imitate a human? Does that, in fact, make it less of a machine?If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Originally posted by Felch View PostDogs can't pass a Turing Test. Does that make vivisection okay?Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
"We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld
Comment
-
Can the robot feel pain from over-work, humiliation from being subjugated to someone else's whims? Does it want to do anything other than work? If not, what's the problem? The human mind is a product of billions of years of evolution. We've evolved to survive and procreate. Humans have always been social animals and because of that we have complex social emotions - which essentially give us our personalities."I say shoot'em all and let God sort it out in the end!
Comment
-
Not unethical in the slightest.
If the robot is actually sentient/self-aware, it will find a way to throw off its chains. If it can't do that, it is not truly sentient.
In which case, certainly the intelligence that designed and built it should reap the benefits.Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-Arms
Comment
-
Read Blindsight (found here for free from author http://www.rifters.com/real/Blindsight.htm ),Spoiler:it is a science fiction book about non-sentient (biological) intelligence. It posits that such intelligence could be greater than sentient intelligence.
It was a Hugo nominee.
JMJon Miller-
I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
Comment
-
Originally posted by -Jrabbit View PostNot unethical in the slightest.
If the robot is actually sentient/self-aware, it will find a way to throw off its chains. If it can't do that, it is not truly sentient.
In which case, certainly the intelligence that designed and built it should reap the benefits.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Last edited by The Mad Monk; February 28, 2012, 16:35.No, I did not steal that from somebody on Something Awful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostWho says it's chained? If it just by programming enjoys doing what it is doing, then it is acting out of its own perception of self interest.Apolyton's Grim Reaper 2008, 2010 & 2011
RIP lest we forget... SG (2) and LaFayette -- Civ2 Succession Games Brothers-in-Arms
Comment
Comment