Originally posted by Al B. Sure!
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Promoting civil rights in Utah
Collapse
X
-
Lesbianism or servicing higher status males on a temporary basis?12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
Since the Bible is OK with polygamy, I don't see why they'd object. How many wives did those Hebrew kings have, after all?Originally posted by Al B. Sure! View PostWe had this discussion not too long ago... I remember talk of the complications of how divorce relates to a polygamist marriage... but I think everyone here except for Ben (and probably Kidicious) has no problem with polygamist marriages as long as the parties involved are all of age and the marriage is consensual.
And Jesus clearly is a polygamist, considering all nuns are his brides.Tutto nel mondo è burla
Comment
-
I agree with the Poly consensus that plural marriage between consenting adults should be legal. Lots of complex issues to hammer out with regards to children, inevitable divorce and death, but nothing that's insurmountable. I think that the welfare fraud issue would be less of a problem once these marriages were legally recognized, as the current system regards surplus wives as single mothers. Once they are recognized as surplus wives, then there is a legal category for them that laws can be built to accommodate. (In other words, the illegal nature of the marriages aggravates the fraud.)
Poly is pro-poly, generally. I guess that's kind of obvious, eh?
Comment
-
He figures with all the fatties on poly, no one will have the balls to say "Dinner is always wrong."Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View PostWhy are you named dinner?"Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson
“In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter
Comment
-
This is all true.Originally posted by Tuberski View PostAll of that is what is going on right now, if they were legally allowed to get married, they wouldn't get as many benefits.
And it was the federal government requiring Utah to outlaw polygamy to become a state, that caused a lot of these problems today.
I think polygamists are idiots, but if they had legal rights to marry, the women would have more resources to get out of these marriages.
ACK!
This is also true.Originally posted by Mojotronica View PostI agree with the Poly consensus that plural marriage between consenting adults should be legal. Lots of complex issues to hammer out with regards to children, inevitable divorce and death, but nothing that's insurmountable. I think that the welfare fraud issue would be less of a problem once these marriages were legally recognized, as the current system regards surplus wives as single mothers.Try http://wordforge.net/index.php for discussion and debate.
Comment
-
Temporarily.Originally posted by MrFun View PostWait! Wait! BK is gone?
Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
"Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead
Comment
-

That is not technically a false dichotomy though. False dichotomy is when ~(a U b) is not empty, not when a intersection b is not empty12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
Where did you two dipwads learn logic? A false ****otomy is just what they call it when you try to "pray away the gay" for a girl. Sheesh!
You spelled it wrong and everything...
Comment
-
'Context' ?Originally posted by DinoDoc View PostHello, MrFun. Please learn to follow the context of a conversation before going off in an overly emotional huff.
What drivel. You've just been caught out. And if you think I'm being 'overly emotional', you really are a sad little man....Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.
...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915
Comment
Comment