So Republicans..Whose your guy/gal???

[Felch]

Rick Perry (disclosure: my wife, Mari Will, advises him) has been disappointing in debates. They test nothing pertinent to presidential duties but have become absurdly important.

What about sustaining a thought, or stringing words together into complete sentences?

[Al B. Sure!]

Interesting:

Mitt Romney
Al B. Sure! Donegeal Hauldren Collider Jaguar Tupac Shakur

Newt Gingrich
DanS rah The Mad Monk

Ron Paul
Felch gribbler HalfLotus OzzyKP SlowwHand

[HalfLotus]

How the f can you have a Gadsden flag for your avatar and vote for Gingrich? He's more liberal than Romney.

You monkeys should be Democrats.

[HalfLotus]

And F debates. Hey, lets give some guys 10 minutes and Ron Paul 89 seconds. Seems fair!

Dunno why anyone would take liars like Gingrich at their word anyway.

Most of these candidates have terrible decades-long legislative records, but people ignore that and lap up their debate lies like its warm milk

[Hauldren Collider]

I'm voting for Romney because he's the most likely to beat Obama. No other reason.

[Elok]

I voted Gary Johnson but I saw Huntsman on Colbert and he's sharp

Just watched the segment after reading this. He has a definite politician look about him (also and by contrast, something about his face or voice reminds me of Mr. Rogers somehow), but he does come across as a clever and generally likeable fellow. Up till now I'd only read his positions.

[HalfLotus]

I'm voting for Romney because he's the most likely to beat Obama. No other reason.

Typical cheerleading Republican. LOLZ WE WUN!

Meanwhile the difference in policy will be nil.

[Al B. Sure!]

Typical cheerleading Republican. LOLZ WE WUN!

Meanwhile the difference in policy will be nil.

So the **** what? I'm not having my party keep turning into the party of ****** Southern evangelicals, creationists, teabaggers, and other white trash. That's not the party of Teddy Roosevelt, Eisenhower, and Reagan.

[DinoDoc]

So the **** what? I'm not having my party keep turning into the party of ****** Southern evangelicals, creationists, teabaggers, and other white trash. That's not the party of Teddy Roosevelt, Eisenhower, and Reagan.

You realize that Reagan was part of the process of chasing Rockefeller Republicans away given their opposition to his Presidency?

[Al B. Sure!]

You realize that Reagan was part of the process of chasing Rockefeller Republicans away given their opposition to his Presidency?

I am aware but it wasn't full-fledged ****** yet. I wanted to say someone historically recent but Nixon gives off a bad vibe

[Elok]

Whereas Reagan is a demi-god to all the groups you disparaged.

[DinoDoc]

Meanwhile the difference in policy will be nil.

I highly doubt the policy of a Republican administration post-Obama would have no significant policy differences with Obama.

[DinoDoc]

I'm voting for Romney because he's the most likely to beat Obama. No other reason.

Buckley Rule

[HalfLotus]

I highly doubt the policy of a Republican administration post-Obama would have no significant policy differences with Obama.

I assume that "significant" policies would include the resulting WWIII, national bankruptcy, and domestic marshal law. Cause both parties are heading right down all three of those policy roads. Ron Paul is the only exception.

But by all means, continue to fiddle and play the petty game of saving party face. You can smile and wink while you pose for Republican Party pictures at summer FEMA camp.

[Hauldren Collider]

So the **** what? I'm not having my party keep turning into the party of ****** Southern evangelicals, creationists, teabaggers, and other white trash. That's not the party of Teddy Roosevelt, Eisenhower, and Reagan.

So basically, you don't want former Southern Democrats.