Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Harvad Study: 1 American dies every 12 minutes due to treatable illnesses due to lack of insurance.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by kentonio View Post
    I found a figure of 107 Deaths Per Minute total in the US. One every 12 minute due to a lack of insurance would be 43,800 a year dying unnecessarily. Or about 14.5 9/11's if you prefer.
    107*60*24*365 = 56239200

    So, uh, 56 million deaths a year in a population with only 307 million? Yeah, I'm sure the average lifespan is only five or six years. Or maybe Americans are almost all senior citizens and our population is rapidly dwindling.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by loinburger View Post
      "1 person dies every twelve minutes due to lack of health insurance." "Lol I don't understand statistics or mathematics"
      Okay, let's hear you defend these cookie-cutter statements that fail to impart any real meaning on the listener, unless he happens to have memorized the number people who die in {specified region} in {specified period of time}?
      If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
      ){ :|:& };:

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by gribbler View Post
        107*60*24*365 = 56239200

        So, uh, 56 million deaths a year in a population with only 307 million? Yeah, I'm sure the average lifespan is only five or six years. Or maybe Americans are almost all senior citizens and our population is rapidly dwindling.
        My bad, I trusted a weak source. I just added it up too and went 'duh..'.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
          Okay, let's hear you defend these cookie-cutter statements that fail to impart any real meaning on the listener, unless he happens to have memorized the number people who die in {specified region} in {specified period of time}?
          Weren't you the same poster who said that 20,000 was an insignificant sample size? Because if so, no amount of mathematics will convince you of anything.
          <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
            Okay, let's hear you defend these cookie-cutter statements that fail to impart any real meaning on the listener, unless he happens to have memorized the number people who die in {specified region} in {specified period of time}?
            Why does it matter how many people die in other ways? Isn't it enough to know that nearly 44,000 people lose their lives when they don't need to?

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by loinburger View Post
              Weren't you the same poster who said that 20,000 was an insignificant sample size? Because if so, no amount of mathematics will convince you of anything.
              Um, no? And if I did, I'd like to hereby take that statement back, because it's stupid.
              If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
              ){ :|:& };:

              Comment


              • #22
                In that case, anybody with an ounce of mathematical sense could calculate that 1 death every 12 minutes equates to around 44000 deaths per year. Whether you consider this insignificant is your call. (You considered 2400 deaths from malnutrition to be insignificant, so who knows.)
                <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by loinburger View Post
                  In that case, anybody with an ounce of mathematical sense could calculate that 1 death every 12 minutes equates to around 44000 deaths per year. Whether you consider this insignificant is your call. (You considered 2400 deaths from malnutrition to be insignificant, so who knows.)
                  So let me get this straight--you're arguing that the only important thing is that the absolute number of people who die. It only matters if that number seems high and tugs your heartstrings. It makes no difference whether there's some other problem to focus our resources on that kills more people and would be cheaper to solve. It doesn't matter if the number is 44,000 out of 7 million or 44,000 out of 7 billion--only that it's 44,000 a year? Simply knowing that 44,000 people die a year of something is enough to tell you everything you need to know about whether you should worry about that particular problem? That's very interesting, loin.
                  If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                  ){ :|:& };:

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    That seems to be the basic logic behind the invasion of Afghanistan and the War on Terror. Oh, and those retarded 9/11 threads that seem to come every year.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                      So let me get this straight--you're arguing that the only important thing is that the absolute number of people who die. It only matters if that number seems high and tugs your heartstrings. It makes no difference whether there's some other problem to focus our resources on that kills more people and would be cheaper to solve. It doesn't matter if the number is 44,000 out of 7 million or 44,000 out of 7 billion--only that it's 44,000 a year? Simply knowing that 44,000 people die a year of something is enough to tell you everything you need to know about whether you should worry about that particular problem? That's very interesting, loin.
                      Are you saying that 44000 deaths per year is insignificant? It's a yes or no question; I'm pretty sure I know the answer.
                      <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by loinburger View Post
                        Are you saying that 44000 deaths per year is insignificant? It's a yes or no question; I'm pretty sure I know the answer.
                        I'm saying that I don't know if it's significant or not just from the number. It's high enough to trigger the "sad face" nerve, if that's what you're asking, but I'd advise against designing government policy over what makes us feel sad instead of what actually makes logical sense.
                        If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                        ){ :|:& };:

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                          I'm saying that I don't know if it's significant or not just from the number.
                          Approximately 0.1% of the US population and you don't know if it's significant? What the ****?
                          <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by loinburger View Post
                            Approximately 1% of the US population and you don't know if it's significant? What the ****?
                            Well what percent of the population dies per year? Give me that and then give me how cost effective it would be to solve this and then the cost effectiveness of solving other major killers and then I'll know if it's significant. It's almost as if deciding where to allocate resources is a complex affair...
                            If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                            ){ :|:& };:

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                              Well what percent of the population dies per year?
                              <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                The point I am making is that these statistics are not intended to get you to think critically about how many people have died. If you told one room full of people that "3,000 people die per year of satan-soul-devouring syndrome" and another room "2 people die per minute of spontaneous lung explosion" and another room "40 people die every month of hyper-rabies" then I would guess that the reactions in all three rooms would be roughly the same. It has nothing to do with what the disease is, how many people die, and over what period of time. It's just a stock phrase used to make people upset about something. And it's meaningless.
                                If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
                                ){ :|:& };:

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X