Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Grover Norquist is literally retarded.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Grover Norquist is literally retarded.

    Originally posted by HP
    Patriotic Millionaires To Grover Norquist: 'Move To Somalia'

    WASHINGTON -- Patriotic Millionaires for Fiscal Strength, millionaires who want the government to tax them more, met with foremost anti-tax guru Grover Norquist in Washington late Wednesday afternoon. Not surprisingly, they couldn't find common ground -- and ended up debating the state of Somalia.

    Patriotic Millionaires, a group of 200-plus people making more than $1 million per year (including actress Edie Falco and economist Nouriel Roubini, among others), believe that America has been good to them and that it is their duty to give back. "[The government] provided a foundation through which we could succeed," writes the group on their website. "Now, we want to do our part to keep that foundation strong so that others can succeed as we have."

    In an interview with The Huffington Post, Norquist felt the group only represented liberal interests.

    "They were there with a heavy partisan message," Norquist told HuffPost Thursday. "The kinds of arguments I got from these old people weren't interesting when I was 12, the left has not advanced. These guys are Democratic Party hacks."

    The six millionaires who met with Norquist on Wednesday were part of a larger effort by the group to convince super committee members and other influential lawmakers that the richest Americans deserve a tax hike, arguing specifically that the highest earners should pay 39.6 percent in taxes, up from the current 35 percent.

    The conversation with Norquist, however, which comes just over a week before the congressional super committee must come up with its deficit-slashing plan, turned out to be less a policy discussion than a philosophical debate.

    Norquist's belief is that the government's prime goal is to promote liberty.

    "I think government, up to a certain point, advances human liberty. Police, a judicial system and an army to prevent people from stealing stuff out of your car, out of your house, knocking you on your head or the Canadians coming over and invading the country," he said. "Those are actually mentioned in the Constitution and in the history of our country as legitimate things for our government to do and they make us freer, not less free. I am for limited government that does a limited number of things competently."

    Eric Schoenberg, a member of Patriotic Millionaires and an Adjunct Associate Professor at Columbia Business School met with Norquist in his offices Wednesday. He said that Patriotic feel that liberty only fits within a context and that government has a truly fundamental role in ensuring that people have liberty. Part of the way they do that is by investing in things that benefit the public.

    In a phone call directly after the meeting, Schoenberg debriefed HuffPost in full:

    [Norquist] raised an issue we get all the time which is, 'Well there's nothing stopping you guys from paying higher taxes, just send a check to the government!' And this to me is frankly an absurd position; I don't consider it to be a very serious argument. Government is not a charity and we can't rely on voluntary contributions from people to support the things that government does. And I also said to him, 'Look would you be willing to sign a pledge where you're willing to forgo all the benefits that government provides? Are you willing to sign a pledge that says you don't want the U.S. military to protect you? That you will refuse to contact the police if somebody steals from you? That you will refuse to contact the fire department if your house is on fire? Because that's the equivalent! Why should you get a free ride? Why should you benefit from my willingness to support the government? Let's do it together.' And he said, 'If I don't have to pay any taxes for it, I would forgo all those things!' To which my response was, 'Well there's an easy way to do that, move to Somalia!' And his argument was, 'Somalia doesn't suffer from too little government, it suffers from too much government.' I don't even begin to understand what that means, but again there's only so much you can go into in these conversations.
    Regarding Somalia, Norquist said Thursday that the government there doesn't do enough to promote liberty.

    "Somalia has competing governments, they're called clans, and they shoot each other," he said. "They have a series of governments that claim complete control over your property and your life. They have a whole bunch of governments, people acting like governments, people with a legal monopoly on force and they compete with each other. Not compete to provide better services, compete to be in charge of pushing you around."

    When the Wednesday meeting adjourned, the groups had found but one point of common ground.

    "Our final point of agreement," said Schoenberg, "was the United States is less sucky than other places."
    Just... wow..

  • #2
    Qute.
    With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

    Steven Weinberg

    Comment


    • #3
      No, he's not literally retarded. You're a moron.

      The word you are searching for is LITERALLY THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT YOU USED.

      Comment


      • #4
        That actually made a ton of sense, I'm not sure why you think it's stupid, kentonio.


        Norquist's belief is that the government's prime goal is to promote liberty.
        So retarded! The audacity!

        "Somalia has competing governments, they're called clans, and they shoot each other," he said. "They have a series of governments that claim complete control over your property and your life. They have a whole bunch of governments, people acting like governments, people with a legal monopoly on force and they compete with each other. Not compete to provide better services, compete to be in charge of pushing you around."
        Is any of this actually false?
        If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
        ){ :|:& };:

        Comment


        • #5
          Well the "competing governments = Somali clans" thing makes no sense at all, unless you redefine gov so broadly that it becomes a meaningless term.
          Blah

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Kuciwalker View Post
            No, he's not literally retarded. You're a moron.

            The word you are searching for is LITERALLY THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT YOU USED.
            Thank you.
            Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
            "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by BeBro View Post
              Well the "competing governments = Somali clans" thing makes no sense at all, unless you redefine gov so broadly that it becomes a meaningless term.
              Um, no. They actually do perform all the functions of a government. Albeit a tyrannical and evil one. There's actually not a lot of difference between most governments and organized crime, when you think about it.
              If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
              ){ :|:& };:

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                Um, no. They actually do perform all the functions of a government. Albeit a tyrannical and evil one.
                Yeah, like those street gangs in western cities that rule over their blocks. Too much gov
                Blah

                Comment


                • #9
                  My boss got mad at me for wearing a speedo on casual Friday, and I was like "Argh too much government!"
                  <p style="font-size:1024px">HTML is disabled in signatures </p>

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by BeBro View Post
                    Well the "competing governments = Somali clans" thing makes no sense at all, unless you redefine gov so broadly that it becomes a meaningless term.
                    Given that those sorts of clans are the direct antecedents of the modern notion of government, and provide many of the services considered essential to government (taxation, law enforcement, defense), how is he wrong?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Hauldren Collider View Post
                      That actually made a ton of sense
                      It would to you, but you'd be, as usual, wrong.
                      “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                      - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View Post
                        It would to you, but you'd be, as usual, wrong.
                        You're an idiot.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Kuciwalker View Post
                          Given that those sorts of clans are the direct antecedents of the modern notion of government, and provide many of the services considered essential to government (taxation, law enforcement, defense), how is he wrong?
                          Originally posted by BeBro View Post
                          Yeah, like those street gangs in western cities that rule over their blocks. Too much gov
                          I think BeBro answered you already.
                          “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                          - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            this is gonna be funny

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui View Post
                              I think BeBro answered you already.
                              You're an idiot.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X