Tweet
You're like a Homo Erectus cloned from fossil DNA and released into modern society, Sava. In your time you competed reasonably well, but today you're nothing more than a sideshow; a reminder of how weak we once were...
-
12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum -
While the "media" is not an altruistic group of individuals and organizations, they reflect opinions and feelings more than they create or perpetuate. Take television, for example. The remote control allows for instant death of unwanted content. Boner pill commercial? Not unless you have some big titted woman for me.Originally posted by Kidicious View Post
It's not church. I'm not stuck listening to the blowhard as I wonder whether or not I'll get home in time for kickoff. No sir.
We vote with our interest. They give us what we want or we change the channel. Unpopular messages die in production meetings.
Ironically, media outlets exaggerate media influence because it is an accepted message. Such an idea is rooted in a deep seeded feeling of denial. What? Somebody believes a point of view different to my own? It must be because some powerful entity planted such seeds in their malleable brains. It certainly couldn't be because people would believe such nonsense that is opposed to my point of view! My POV is supreme. Any fool that thinks otherwise is an innocent victim of media mind control.
But if they are so powerful, how come they are unable to their magic powers pushing their primary revenue source?To us, it is the BEAST.Comment
-
I like my homos erectOriginally posted by KrazyHorse View Post
and when "modern society" crumbles into absolute chaos the second the power goes out, my mad caveman skills permit me to **** all your base... because it belong to meTo us, it is the BEAST.Comment
-
Wages don't compensate you for harm suffered. Wages compensate you for your contribution to society.Originally posted by Sava View PostWow. What an enlightened perspective. How silly for one to think that a so-called "American wage" would be something every human being should be given as compensation for industrial society denying people the freedom to live on their own land in their own country... for bringing war and economic devastation to every corner of the globe (except your backyard)... and for possibly sending us down the path to human extinction.
We all know nobody deserves reparations for anything that has happened in the past... restitution... compensation... but yeah, people should just kill themselves! Or better yet, let's do it for them! John Brown did nothing wrong.Comment
-
Wages are not compensation. A wage is a form of extortion leveraged against squalor. Work or starve! 1,400 sq feet, less space than most middle class American homes, can effectively feed over 100,000 people in any region... via high yield indoor agriculture.Originally posted by Felch View Post
An obsolete economic system encourages low rates of production than technology permits.
Private businesses are modern kingdoms... oligarchical political structures apart from the legitimate democratic forms of government.
Currency, also obsolete, is a physical representation of another human being's time. Time is life. Possession of currency (and other forms... commodities, intermediate and finished goods) is the possession of human life. That's called slavery.
While it cannot be proven that there is an objective authority who can speak to the morality of such things, subjective beliefs act as a practical substitute.
Semantics do not change reality. But they do allow for excellent subterfuge which permit campaigns of misinformation to succeed... with varying degrees of effectiveness.
Anyone who has worked a day in their life understands this. Anyone who benefits from such work understands this.
The system survives because extortion works. Most believe they have more to lose than gain.
I'm often accused of being a "leftist". But I am not offering opinion. My policy goals are generally opposed to so called "leftist" policies for two reasons. First, I personally benefit due to my economic situation... SCORE! But second, because I believe evolution in the political economy can only occur as a result of hardship and suffering.
It is an interesting situation to say the least. I don't wish to be poor. I admit my addiction to this lifestyle. I like being able to pay for anything I want at any time. Though, excessively luxurious items are certainly not worth the cost and generally represent an unnecessary expense. Equivalent, or even greater, levels of satisfaction can be attained more efficiently.
Personal expenditures are all experience driven. All forms of experience are ultimately brain-based. Aside from managing my own biology, my sensory interpretation mechanisms are responsible for satisfaction. Paying the least for the most is merely good business.
NOW ENTERTAIN ME SLAVETo us, it is the BEAST.Comment
-
You mean like paying your dealer for your meth?Originally posted by Felch View PostI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Dude the media is retarded. It was an insult.Originally posted by Sava View PostI drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
-
Originally posted by Sava View PostI like my homos erect
and when "modern society" crumbles into absolute chaos the second the power goes out, my mad caveman skills permit me to **** all your base... because it belong to me
Socrates: "Good is That at which all things aim, If one knows what the good is, one will always do what is good." Brian: "Romanes eunt domus"
GW 2013: "and juistin bieber is gay with me and we have 10 kids we live in u.s.a in the white house with obama"Comment
-
Seriously? You think ~0.00000013 hectares is sufficient to feed someone? What evidence can you provide for that?Originally posted by Sava View PostComment
-
"The minimum amount of agricultural land necessary for sustainable food security, with a diversified diet similar to those of North America and Western Europe (hence including meat), is 0.5 of a hectare per person. This does not allow for any land degradation such as soil erosion, and it assumes adequate water supplies. Very few populous countries have more than an average of 0.25 of a hectare. It is realistic to suppose that the absolute minimum of arable land to support one person is a mere 0.07 of a hectare–and this assumes a largely vegetarian diet, no land degradation or water shortages, virtually no post-harvest waste, and farmers who know precisely when and how to plant, fertilize, irrigate, etc." - [FAO, 1993]
Little did the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations know they were off in their estimate by a factor of 500,000!Comment
-
Don't they do both? No one would work for a wage if they didn't think the wage was worth the harm they will suffer obtaining it.Originally posted by Felch View PostComment
-
Did anyone else read this and immediately recall Ecofarm?Originally posted by gribbler View PostIf there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:Comment
-
Yeah, but this is pedotard on steroids
Comment
-
Ad for Paul's upcoming money bomb, almost certain to be a recordbreaker:
And a nice homemade supporter video:
Comment
-
Half, summary?I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett KavanaughComment
Comment