Originally posted by gribbler
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Thread in which the world laughs at America
Collapse
X
-
Jon Miller: MikeH speaks the truth
Jon Miller: MikeH is a shockingly revolting dolt and a masturbatory urine-reeking sideshow freak whose word is as valuable as an aging cow paddy.
We've got both kinds
-
I can now get a 5-year fixed mortgage rate of 3.07%
And it's expected to go down more! Good times..."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Originally posted by Asher View PostYou are clearly some kind of mentally deficient moron.
It is a moral issue -- providing access to everyone. The specifics of how that is implemented are up for debate (Germany vs Canada vs the UK...). This is not, in any way, logically inconsistent. Please learn how to read, comprehend, and respond appropriately instead of wasting my time.
Your reading comprehension skills are just short of Ben Kenobi's. Congratulations; you're an idiot.If there is no sound in space, how come you can hear the lasers?
){ :|:& };:
Comment
-
Zevico is a moron and so is anyone who thought his posts here were "insightful". That's not mud-slinging, it's a simple, observable fact.
Recap of his positions:
1) Positions cannot be "heartless"
2) Universal health care has nothing to do with morality
3) It is an example of religious bigotry and a hate crime to use the phrase "Jesus Christ" (this is my best guess for the reason I am guilty of a hate crime, I can't fathom anything else remotely even close)
4) It is logically inconsistent to say it is a moral duty to provide health care to all citizens in rich, developed countries, but to say there are details in the economic implementation of this that can be debated
Insightful indeed."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Mad Monk View PostDid you drop a one, there, or are you simply rolling in cash?
Incidentally I am rolling in cash right now with close to zero expenses and a ****load of income between me and my SO."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Well, the amortization period doesn't matter for the rate. I was referring to the term."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
I'll probably get a 20-year mortgage, but with liberal prepayment options. My goal is to have it 100% paid off in 5-7 years, but I'd like flexibility on the biweekly payments so I'll keep them lowish."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Originally posted by Asher View PostWell, the amortization period doesn't matter for the rate. I was referring to the term.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ColdWizard View PostI've never heard of a 5 year fixed program. 10, 15, 20, 30, 40 years but not 5. Unless you mean 5/1 ARM.
The standard mortgage, at least in Canada, is a 5-year term with 25 year amortization period. The rate is fixed for the term, then it is renewed after the term expires with new rates.
In the US, do you carry the rate for the entire amortization period?"The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
This is interesting.
2. Shorter-Term Fixed Rates in Canada. Canadian mortgages carry a fixed interest rate for a maximum of five years, and rates are then re-negotiated for the next five years, similar to a five-year adjustable rate. This practice allows banks to achieve a better maturity match between their assets (mortgages and loans) and interest income, and their liabilities (deposits) and interest expense, which protects them from the kind of maturity mismatch and interest rate risk that resulted in our S&L crisis and almost 3,000 bank failures in the 1980s and 1990s.
Bottom Line: Taken together, the features and regulations of banks in Canada outlined above create a healthy and sound “pro-lender” environment absent of political motivations for outcomes like greater homeownership, compared to the often politically motivated “pro-borrower” and “pro-homeowner” policies of the United States. While Canada’s banking system has promoted responsible borrowing and prudent lending and underwriting practices with little politically motivated interference, the U.S. banking system seems to have encouraged excessive lending to risky borrowers because of the political obsession with homeownership.
Canada’s banks are generally ranked as the safest and soundest in the world, and their non-politicized banking system could provide a model for banking reform in the United States. Moving towards the Canadian banking system could go a long way towards stabilizing our mortgage, credit, and housing markets and make us less vulnerable to financial shocks in the future."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Originally posted by Asher View Post
The standard mortgage, at least in Canada, is a 5-year term with 25 year amortization period. The rate is fixed for the term, then it is renewed after the term expires with new rates.
In the US, do you carry the rate for the entire amortization period?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Asher View PostThis is interesting.
Ghetto USA
Comment
Comment