In the Name of Allah the Beneficent, the Merciful

[N35t0r]

Yeah, the diary of Anne Frank is all made-up lies as well

[kotletas]

I didn't know that.
__________________
viagra generic
viagra cheap

[Heraclitus]

You mustnt take everything you read on Apolyton seriusly kotletas

Yeah, the diary of Anne Frank is all made-up lies as well

From wikipedia:

Criticisms of the diary

Anne Frank's story has become symbolic of the scale of Nazi atrocities during the war, a stark exemplar of Jewish suffering under Adolf Hitler, and a dire warning of the consequences of persecution. However, claims that Anne Frank’s diary was fabricated are a common element of Holocaust denial.[5]

Holocaust deniers such as Robert Faurisson have claimed that the diary is a forgery,[6] though critical and forensic studies of the text and the original manuscript have supported its authenticity.[7]

Otto Frank had stated that prior to the book's publication he cut many passages from the original manuscript that he thought would be of little interest to the general reader and that he had assigned pseudonyms to protect the identities of those Anne Frank had mentioned by name. Some, such as David Irving, have suggested this was evidence that the published version was not an accurate transcription of the manuscripts, and even that the work had been written wholly or partly by Otto Frank or one of his associates. In his will, Otto Frank bequeathed his daughter's original manuscripts to the Netherlands Institute for War Documentation. After Frank's death in 1980, the Institute commissioned a forensic study of the manuscripts. The material composition of the original notebooks as well as the ink and handwriting found within them and the loose version were extensively examined. In 1986 the results were published. The handwriting was found to be consistent with known examples of Anne Frank's handwriting. The paper, ink and glue found in the diaries and loose papers were consistent with materials available in Amsterdam during the period in which the diary was written.[7]

The survey of her manuscripts compared an unabridged transcription of Anne Frank's original notebooks with the entries she expanded and clarified on loose paper in a rewritten form and the final edit as it was prepared for the U.S publication. The investigation revealed that all of the entries in the published version were accurate transcriptions of manuscript entries in Anne Frank's handwriting, and that they represented approximately a third of the material collected for the initial publication. The magnitude of edits to the text is comparable to other historical diaries such as those by Katherine Mansfield, Virginia Woolf and Anaïs Nin in that they all revised their diaries after the initial draft, and the material was posthumously edited into a publishable manuscript by their respective husbands.

Of course she could have been lying, but why would she do that? I really doubt such an explanation.

N35t0r is being facetious. Note the content of the post above his.
Also on the off chance you where referencing something else you should probably quote it since people may get the wrong impression reading the last two bits.

[Al B. Sure!]

That guy isn't real.

[Heraclitus]

Sigh.


I guess I'm just too hopefull. For a time it really seemed like Civ5 would bring in a few new ones.

[ricketyclik]

That guy isn't real.

How can you tell?

[Al B. Sure!]

sarcastic or serious?

[ricketyclik]

Seriously.

[Al B. Sure!]

He has two posts and they're both very short fairly nonsequitor responses to off-topic threads with glaring titles that stick out on the list. Plus, he registered a few days ago but hasn't posted til now. Normally, I think if someone thinks it worthwhile to post to a forum, they register and post the same day (why else would they register unless they felt compelled to comment on something?).

[ricketyclik]

If it's a spambot shouldn't it be spamming? What is its point?

[Al B. Sure!]

That's what I thought but another apolytoner pointed out some guy like a week and a half ago that was fake and I thought he was real because I thought just that... but then, sure enough, he posted spam.

Also, are they always bots? Sometimes, spammers seem like real people (albeit foreigners ) who might actually be getting paid to flood the web with spam manually. It seems retarded when a program can do it but sometimes they seem a little too real and respond to you. I think Cracked the comedy site did one where the guy was pretending to be in love with the spammer and the spammer would respond back and it seemed like it was a perplexed foreigner with a thin grasp of the English language.

It's a comedy site so the interaction was probably written by the writer but it's possible it was real. Anyone try to engage these guys in conversation?

[Al B. Sure!]

http://www.cracked.com/article/234_the-spambot-who-seduced-me-true-story-forbidden-love/

Pretty funny.

[Kidlicious]

Jesus was Hebrew, not Jewish.

We don't know what race he was. According to some of the Bible he was atleast part Gentile.

[Jon Miller]

We don't know what race he was. According to some of the Bible he was atleast part Gentile.

Really? Where did you get this?

His human mother and father were Mary and Joseph. Joseph was a Jew, Mary must have been a jew for Christ to be a Jew (which He was, otherwise He wouldn't have gone to the Jewish observances).

Nothing in the Bible depicts Him not being a Jew.

Where do you get this?

JM

[Kidlicious]

The family tree in the Gospel according to Luke