Panic in Georgia over feared Russian invasion.

[DinoDoc]

What do you call Grozny?

[Serb]

Well, I can tell you what it is not. It is not 172 dead people.

Then how many dead civilians do you need to call something a genocide?

You know from legal point of view it doesn't really matter how much you have stolen a dollar or a billion - it's still a thievery.

Russia knew damn well it was lying about genocide.

You are the only liar here. Did Russia still claim there were 2 000 killed civilians?

No.
Guess why? 'cause we had our own investigation.
But, back then in 2008, we didn't have the results of this investigation and based our civilian casualties estimates on the info we had. How could we know these reports are exaggerated or not? And to what extend they are exaggereted? It was war, God damn it.
Still, an attack against civilians is still an attack against civilians. NO MATTER HUNDREDS OR THOUSANDS HAVE BEEN KILLED AS A RESULT. And we had no doubt that such attack have been commited by the order of Sukashvili.

Falsely claiming that others were committing genocide to justify an invasion is just about as fkd up as it gets.

You must be really dumb or something?

Our soldiers, our peacekeepers WERE DYING THERE. They have been under constant attacks from regular Georgian army. And our peacekeepers did not have any heavy weaponry, while the opposing side attacked them with tanks, arty, GRADs and aviation (aside the fact our peacekeepers were heavily outnumbered). Had we didn't do a thing to save our boys they whould have slaughtered them all. Hundreds of Russian soldiers.

Would the US of A abondoned a hundreds of US peacekeepers in such situation?

ANSWER THIS QUESTION!!!

Falsely claiming that others were committing genocide to justify an invasion is just about as fkd up as it gets.

Besides this is a sig material wrt American agression over Yugoslavia.

[Serb]

What do you call Grozny?

A Russian build fortress Groznaya.

[Ecofarm]

The US should have bombed that Russian tank column en route to the capital.

[Serb]

So, you would have intervenue to save your soldiers?

So, how the f*ck you can blame us for doing exactly the same?

[DinoDoc]

So, you would have intervenue to save your soldiers?

So, how the f*ck you can blame us for doing exactly the same?

We wouldn't have allowed and encouraged a campaign of escalation on the part of our proxies if we were truely interested in peace.

[Serb]

The US should have bombed that Russian tank column en route to the capital.

You had alike plans. But thanks God even a dumbass like Bush had enough brains to do not start WW3 over a military adventure of its brainless Georgian puppet.

[Serb]

We wouldn't have allowed and encouraged a campaign of escalation on the part of our proxies if we were truely interested in peace.

Holy sh!t.

We were the ones who were constantly saying that Sukashvili regime is going to attack South Ossetia. Did anyone listen to us?
NO.

But even after this EU report (which says that everything what Sukashvili was saying to approve his agression WAS NOTHING BUT LIE) you KEEP REPEATING THE SAME BULLSH!T AS ALWAYS: Sukashvili had to bombard Tskhinval (read: to kill civilians) to protect Georgia from Russians.

You are either a hopless moron or cinical motherf*cker.
I think you are the last.

[DinoDoc]

You're own source disagrees with you.

[Serb]

Nope. My own source didn't say a word about SO paramilitaries somehow encouraged this attack on Tskhinval.
My own source says exactly the opposite:

In more than 1,000 pages of analysis, documentation and witness statements, the most exhaustive inquiry into the five-day conflict dismissed Georgian claims that the artillery attack was in response to a Russian invasion

The Georgian offensive against Tskhinvali was not justified under international law.

The western-backed Georgian leader, Saakashvili, was found to have started the war with the attack on Tskhinvali, the South Ossetian capital, on the night of 7 August last year.

Flatly dismissing Saakashvili's version, the report said: "There was no ongoing armed attack by Russia before the start of the Georgian operation ... Georgian claims of a large-scale presence of Russian armed forces in South Ossetia prior to the Georgian offensive could not be substantiated ... It could also not be verified that Russia was on the verge of such a major attack.
But the proper Russian reponse to the artillery barrage came – by land, sea and air – 12 hours after the Georgian action.

[DinoDoc]

You're engaging in selective quoting if you still wish to insist that Russia had clean hands in this crisis. Again I implore you to read your source again.

[Serb]

I gave you a summary.
But before that, I gave you a full article, despite I was perfectly in aware about the anti-Russian parts of it (which I might or don't consider to be true - that's irrelevant).

But still, the summary approves the obvious:
a) Liar
b) Agressor
c) War criminal

End of story.

[Ecofarm]

Serb's avatar is:

A) Captain Penis
B) Colonel Penis
C) Just penis

[Wezil]

I gave you a summary.
But before that, I gave you a full article, despite I was perfectly in aware about the anti-Russian parts of it (which I might or don't consider to be true - that's irrelevant).

But still, the summary approves the obvious:
a) Liar
b) Agressor
c) War criminal

End of story.

So the source is no good except for the parts that exonerate you?

Got it.

[Ecofarm]

I dunno if you needed to quote. I think it's pretty obvious you weren't talking about penis.