Obama nominates NewyoRican female to SCOTUS

[GePap]

This from the poster that thought that Ayers was a significant story, and a poster who hasn't decided whether the act of waterboarding constitutes torture or not.

Care to remind me about a single mayor story of the day in which you have provided posts of any real sunbstance or insight? I certainly haven't made many, but at least I can point to one large story of the day in which I did.

[Kuciwalker]

*MAJOR MAJOR MAJOR MAJOR

FFS this is the one word you CONSISTENTLY MISSPELL

[Drake Tungsten]

This from the poster that thought that Ayers was a significant story

That's news to me. I'm relatively sure that I said it wouldn't become a significant story at the time.

Care to remind me about a single mayor story of the day in which you have provided posts of any real sunbstance or insight?

That's easy...

http://apolyton.net/forums/showpost.php?p=5611133&postcount=67

[GePap]

This from the poster that thought that Ayers was a significant story

That's news to me. I'm relatively sure that I said it wouldn't become a significant story at the time.

Saying that you acknowledge that others woudn't think it significant is different from finding it siginificant yourself.

[Drake Tungsten]

So now you're going to go against what I said at the time and try to tell me what I was really thinking?

[GePap]

So now you're going to go against what I said at the time and try to tell me what I was really thinking?

Post # 20

No, it's about calling Obama a friend of terrorists, which is true. If you don't want it to have a place in American politics, don't nominate candidates who are, in fact, friends with terrorists.

http://www.apolyton.net/forums/showthread.php?t=181077&highlight=Ayers

So I am not supposed to think that when you claim a presidential candidate is a "friend with terrorists" that you think their relation with Ayers mattered?

So what is one supposed to think?

[Drake Tungsten]

Jesus, couldn't you have found a post that was less obviously a troll?

[GePap]

And post #100

Wow. CNN actually does some investigative work on Obama's relationship with Bill Ayers.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvROBLortBQ

Nice work, CNN.

http://www.apolyton.net/forums/showthread.php?t=181077&highlight=Ayers&page=4

So I guess congratulating the media for their investigative work on the issue shows that you didn't think it important?

[GePap]

And then post #297

http://www.apolyton.net/forums/newreply.php?do=newreply&noquote=1&p=5611494

That's certainly possible. However, the fact that Obama didn't cut ties with Ayers until 2005 and with Wright until this year seems to argue against a gradual change of heart. It seems more likely that Obama has either been using these guys for years or that he actually agrees with them.

Somehow you kept bringing up Ayers again and again - but clearly that only shows that in your mind, Obama's relation to Ayers was a non-issue. Yes, of course, that is what your constant statements on that relationship meant. How could anyone miss that?

[Drake Tungsten]

Wow, I can't believe how much we disagreed on this issue in the past.

I agree with GePap. Obama's relationship with Ayers is no big deal.

http://apolyton.net/forums/showpost.php?p=5436158&postcount=151

Also, wasn't I totally on the nose with this?

Is it any wonder your country is in the ****ter when you insist on electing unqualified *******s like Bush and Obama?

http://apolyton.net/forums/showpost.php?p=5436593&postcount=162

[GePap]

Wow, I can't believe how much we disagreed on this issue in the past.

I agree with GePap. Obama's relationship with Ayers is no big deal.

http://apolyton.net/forums/showpost....&postcount=151

Funny, you forgot the end of that post:

Obama should just come clean on the whole matter as soon as possible.

Yup, clearly you thought it was a non-issue, which is why Obama would have to "come clean".....

[Drake Tungsten]

God, I really love you, GePap. You're like Oerdin without the cleverness and fierce intellectual honesty.

[GePap]

Sorry, I couldn't really care about what you wrote last because I am still thinking just how disingenious you are, as shown by your unwillingess to even quote yourself properly.

[Darius871]

[Imran Siddiqui]

I thought you just implied you weren't on the offensive???

Which of course meant "how dare you catch me in what I was really doing!" in GePap-speak.