I would think a 13 year old could be old enough to make the decicion. Er, mature enough. Maybe they should test him psychologically? If he really believes chemo will taint his immortal soul, who are we to argue?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mom endangers son, says guv'mit
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Asher View PostThere's been numerous cases about this in Canada also. Religious nutbags prohibiting medical treatment for their children. No blood transfusions, etc.
I think in most cases the government stepped in and forced the treatment.
Edit: Canadian precedent:
A set of Jehovah's Witness parents refused blood transfusions for their 1-year-old daughter after doctors decided the baby urgently needed them. The baby was made a ward of the state in order to administer blood transfusions. The Supreme Court of Canada ruled that this was a legitimate limitation on religious freedom. [20]A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrFun View PostI bet BK was disappointed that Canada's government put human life over excessive religious liberty."The issue is there are still many people out there that use religion as a crutch for bigotry and hate. Like Ben."
Ben Kenobi: "That means I'm doing something right. "
Comment
-
Comment