Tweet
LOL this has to be THE WORST post-apocalyptic map of the US, EVUH!
Here's mine:
Mexico gets SoCal. Pretty obvious.
Alaska becomes a new Canadian territory. Because it's ours.
China and LOL ?Japan? don't get anything.
The rest divides into a Confederacy and a USSA. South Florida, Maryland, Virginia, and NC remain in the Worker's Councils Union.
The Confederacy becomes immediately divided into a dozen feuding petty states divided by religion and ideology like medieval Europe with assault rifles. 1/3rd of the old US Army and 1/5th of the old US Air Force Join them. The Navy stays with the Union.
The USSA becomes a ponderous Latin American style oligarchy riven by perpetual rioting, hyperinflation, and massive corruption. The sophisticated weapons they inherited suffer the fate of the old USSR due to lack of funds. A thriving international black market in ex-USA technology springs up. There is no religious and little real ideological conflict, but continual 'people's revolutions' as tin-pot dictators arise from the masses, each continually promising to bring reform and inevitably being more corrupt than his predecessor.
Here's mine:
Mexico gets SoCal. Pretty obvious.
Alaska becomes a new Canadian territory. Because it's ours.
China and LOL ?Japan? don't get anything.
The rest divides into a Confederacy and a USSA. South Florida, Maryland, Virginia, and NC remain in the Worker's Councils Union.
The Confederacy becomes immediately divided into a dozen feuding petty states divided by religion and ideology like medieval Europe with assault rifles. 1/3rd of the old US Army and 1/5th of the old US Air Force Join them. The Navy stays with the Union.
The USSA becomes a ponderous Latin American style oligarchy riven by perpetual rioting, hyperinflation, and massive corruption. The sophisticated weapons they inherited suffer the fate of the old USSR due to lack of funds. A thriving international black market in ex-USA technology springs up. There is no religious and little real ideological conflict, but continual 'people's revolutions' as tin-pot dictators arise from the masses, each continually promising to bring reform and inevitably being more corrupt than his predecessor.
.
Comment