Fine.
It is one of the biggest economies in the world, and they are doing very well. Sao Paulo is one the worlds most important industrial areas.
The Economist has been kissing Brazil´s ass for the last few years, and recently they have discovered huge oil fields.
Anyway, those ideas can´t be applied, even if they have all that money, because those ideas are extremely right wing.
You can´t forcefully castrate people.
You can´t take kids aways from their mothers to put them in state owned boarding schools (even if the kid has killed people and his family is a mess)
Demolishing shanty towns is a pain in the ass.
In Argentina, what they did with many shanty towns in the 70´s, was to build huge tower blocks complexes in the buenos aires suburbs and move the poor there.
The tower blocks were not actually bad, they were like those eastern european buildings.
This is one in Villa Lugano for example
The issue is that at the end, they end up becoming "skycraper shanty towns", to keep a building in shape, the people there have to pay, otherwise, the pipes or elevator eventually wil get broken, but the shanty town iinhabitants recently moved there, don´t do that because they are poor. And they keep having kids and you eventually have a family of 7 living in an apartment with only two bedrooms.
That is why moving them to towerblocks ain´t good.
In the shanty towns, if they need an extra room, they build another one over the roof, like this
It is one of the biggest economies in the world, and they are doing very well. Sao Paulo is one the worlds most important industrial areas.
The Economist has been kissing Brazil´s ass for the last few years, and recently they have discovered huge oil fields.
Anyway, those ideas can´t be applied, even if they have all that money, because those ideas are extremely right wing.
You can´t forcefully castrate people.
You can´t take kids aways from their mothers to put them in state owned boarding schools (even if the kid has killed people and his family is a mess)
Demolishing shanty towns is a pain in the ass.
In Argentina, what they did with many shanty towns in the 70´s, was to build huge tower blocks complexes in the buenos aires suburbs and move the poor there.
The tower blocks were not actually bad, they were like those eastern european buildings.
This is one in Villa Lugano for example
The issue is that at the end, they end up becoming "skycraper shanty towns", to keep a building in shape, the people there have to pay, otherwise, the pipes or elevator eventually wil get broken, but the shanty town iinhabitants recently moved there, don´t do that because they are poor. And they keep having kids and you eventually have a family of 7 living in an apartment with only two bedrooms.
That is why moving them to towerblocks ain´t good.
In the shanty towns, if they need an extra room, they build another one over the roof, like this
Comment