Tweet
Originally posted by Patroklos
No, I didn't, but please feel free to quote me doing so. I say that knowing full well that you won't (because you can't), and will continue your little temper tantrum.
No, I didn't, but please feel free to quote me doing so. I say that knowing full well that you won't (because you can't), and will continue your little temper tantrum.
You then denied that you said it was about you:
Me: "my parody wasn't about you (big shock?). "
You: "Nor did I say it was"
But you did. By hinging me providing a quote from you on whether my parody succeeds or not must have the parody be about you.
So yes, you did say that the parody is about you.
Your problem is that by your own admission you expanded your parody beyond radio shows to just right-wingers in general. I will quote you, learn from what I do here so you can support your arguements in the future.
From which you then specifically identify me as one of the "worst offenders." Not being a radio personality, I suppose I fall into your "right winger" category.
You parody only works if those you identify exhibit the behavior you are parodying.
Apparently I display this behavior so prolifically that you felt the need to label me a "worst offender."
Yet when challenged to produce one scrap of the behavior in question, you invoke the Oeridn defense of "I am not going to go through all your threads etc. etc."
Or in other words, you are full of BS and simply have no such quotes, and thus no basis for your parody.
If I am in fact a "worst offender" then it should be a trivial exercise on your part to provide evidence of this. But hey, you also identified DD, so why not quote him?
Now, you'd have to argue that no right-wingers use the logic of my parody in order to call it a failure. But hell, I was following Limbaugh and Graham, so good luck there.
And I rarely pay attention to you, nor should I given the childishness you have displayed in this thread. But again, feel free to back uo any of the personal insults you have bandied about in this thead.
No? What a surprise 
Your the one making broad claims and then personal insults against people, and then fail to back them up. I can't help it if your positions (and using that word is charitable) lack any coroboration.
Dashi's achievements in this thread:
1.) Failed parody in the OP.
2.) Failure to support claims.
3.) Throwing a 2 year old level temper tantrum, complete with personal insults.
4.) Blissfull ignorance of self pwnage.
Dashi
1.) Failed parody in the OP.
2.) Failure to support claims.
3.) Throwing a 2 year old level temper tantrum, complete with personal insults.
4.) Blissfull ignorance of self pwnage.
Dashi
EDIT: And let's be honest here, it is pretty obvious your OP is as much a parody as the 48" pizza post was just a joke. Quite transparent.
So at the end, you can't deny that I've provided the quotes. Again, the logic as to how your quotes alone relate to my parody is silly, but that what you've chosed to cling to.
Now would please just consider yourself pwned. At this point I could write your next response.
Here it is:
No, you are.
You're Oerdin.
You fail.
You get the point. A bunch of non-sequitors, irrational declarations of victory, and character assassination based on the prior two. Again, that's what I've been parodying. If you can't see yourself doing it, don't blame me.
This thread really wasn't that good. For the most part, I'm rather dissappointed with my parody. Patty showed me that I missed a lot. Actually, that's been frustrating me more than anything here. It could have been so much better, if I spent more time reading his posts. Ah well, live and learn. I'm through with this one.
Comment