Re: Systematic Disenfranchisment, Good or Bad?
These tests are culturally biased, but that doesn't mean that they don't also measure better methods of thinking,understanding of processes and so on. It is certainly true that someone from 100 years ago from the US(to say nothing of someone from deep in Africa), would be at a disadvantage taking one of these tests against someone in the US today, but does that mean that the test itself is worthless?
Still I never said that LSAT was perfectly objective, merely that such a test could be constructed, and even then I never said that I wanted to do that. My test was will you go through the hassle and pain of voting.
Originally posted by Zkribbler
I remember when I took a class in preparation of the LSAT. We were instructed that, to get a good score, we had to put ourselves in the mindset of someone who had been raised on a yaught and who never had to do a day's worth of work. Like most tests, it is culturally biased.
I remember when I took a class in preparation of the LSAT. We were instructed that, to get a good score, we had to put ourselves in the mindset of someone who had been raised on a yaught and who never had to do a day's worth of work. Like most tests, it is culturally biased.
Still I never said that LSAT was perfectly objective, merely that such a test could be constructed, and even then I never said that I wanted to do that. My test was will you go through the hassle and pain of voting.
Comment