Systematic Disenfranchisment, Good or Bad?

[Krill]

yeah, but if someone wasn't intelligent how could they learn from their mistakes?

[Flubber]

Originally posted by Krill


Or you could just spam the place proper...

I suppose-- but I never cared about post count


I do get amusement from some of the wild and crazy stuff people post-- If a few posts get them to expand on it - I enjoy it even more

If thats ME being trolled well so be it

[Krill]

Originally posted by Flubber


I suppose-- but I never cared about post count


I do get amusement from some of the wild and crazy stuff people post-- If a few posts get them to expand on it - I enjoy it even more

If thats ME being trolled well so be it

Yeah, if you get trolled, well so be it. I ain;t going to waste my time on other people like that though

[Flubber]

Originally posted by Krill


Yeah, if you get trolled, well so be it. I ain;t going to waste my time on other people like that though

cheers

I guess we should get back on topic

what was the topic again??

[Krill]

Wiglaf was spamming

[Flubber]

Originally posted by Krill
Wiglaf was spamming

Really?? I thought his posts were two lengthy to be spamming and that spamming was more like your one liners--

I thought he was trolling

[Krill]

There's a difference?

[CrONoS]

anyway, Wiglaf had a point

you don't have any incentive to be informed, since your vote doesn't represent how well informed you are. In it's way it can be rationale to be uninformed.

[Krill]

And I'm going to ignore your slanderous insults, flub

[Flubber]

Originally posted by CrONoS
anyway, Wiglaf had a point

you don't have any incentive to be informed, since your vote doesn't represent how well informed you are. In it's way it can be rationale to be uninformed.

NOt really if you hope for a result in what you perceive to be in your own interest

IN that caase it is in your interest that you and all people of similar views be informed so that they can vote correctly for candidates that support those views. IT is also in your interest that those that WOULD oppose you be uninformed--

[Flubber]

Originally posted by Krill
And I'm going to ignore your slanderous insults, flub

I do note in passing that it took you two separate one line posts in order to address said slanderous insults

But then again I recall when Provost posted "and I'll have a cherryade" about 5000 times so your posts are an example of diverse content by comparison

[CrONoS]

Originally posted by Flubber


NOt really if you hope for a result in what you perceive to be in your own interest

IN that caase it is in your interest that you and all people of similar views be informed so that they can vote correctly for candidates that support those views. IT is also in your interest that those that WOULD oppose you be uninformed--

This is truth only if you take part in a very small and a well organized group. (like a farmer)

But, for the majority of people, being politically informed is not rationale.

[Krill]

there is a reason why he didn;t get a Ph.D...no original thinking

[Elok]

Originally posted by Flubber
Really?? I thought his posts were two lengthy to be spamming and that spamming was more like your one liners--

I thought he was trolling

I believe it was Arthur C. Clarke who first said "Any insufficiently advanced logic is indistinguishable from trolling."

[Tuberski]

I have a better idea than Wiggys, instead of an IQ test to be allowed to vote, we make voting one of the innumerable "personality tests" that you can find online.

Everyone takes the test instead of voting for a person. Which ever candidates views most closely match your, is the candidate that gets your "vote".

So when Wiggy does the test, instead of Getting a personality of Right Wing nutjob, he gets a vote of Dick Cheney.



ACK!