Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Science buff- Like Barack Obama? Better not like manned spaceflight then

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by DanS
    In all other endeavors, the US does best when the private sector takes the lead.
    Like, say, health care? The U.S. is the only industrialized nation which relies on private insurance companies to provide health care. As a result, we have the highest costing health care, the fewest people covered, the shortest lifespans, and the highest infant mortality rate.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Whoha
      Because government exists to do these kinds of large scale programs and the private sector isn't going to be able to do them for a long time if at all if ever.
      This is absurd. The private sector is perfectly capable of managing large aerospace R&D and manufacturing projects. Indeed, some projects, like the Boeing 787, put NASA to shame.

      There is no demand in the private sector to invest in anything other then small toy projects, and even that will go away.
      You are ill informed. Hundreds of millions of dollars are being invested every year by the private sector.
      I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

      Comment


      • #48
        I wonder what all that wasted money spent in the Iraq war would have accomplished for NASA. We could've been developing an entire fleet of second generation shuttles and robotic exploration probes.

        Comment


        • #49
          You're wishing that NASA had more white elephants?
          I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

          Comment


          • #50
            Even if you don't believe in the scientific value of manned space flight, at least it would be something to brag about. You really can't say the same for the Iraq war.

            Comment


            • #51
              would be interesting to see what would NASA do with 1/2 trillion over 5 year period...
              Socrates: "Good is That at which all things aim, If one knows what the good is, one will always do what is good." Brian: "Romanes eunt domus"
              GW 2013: "and juistin bieber is gay with me and we have 10 kids we live in u.s.a in the white house with obama"

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Kuciwalker


                It's called the Fermi paradox. Look it up.
                and "rare earth" position is just one of the optional answers. My bet is on "do not want to be detected"/"are too advanced for communication to be meaningfull" position
                Socrates: "Good is That at which all things aim, If one knows what the good is, one will always do what is good." Brian: "Romanes eunt domus"
                GW 2013: "and juistin bieber is gay with me and we have 10 kids we live in u.s.a in the white house with obama"

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Riesstiu IV
                  Even if you don't believe in the scientific value of manned space flight, at least it would be something to brag about. You really can't say the same for the Iraq war.
                  Good point.
                  Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
                  The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
                  The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by DanS
                    This is absurd. The private sector is perfectly capable of managing large aerospace R&D and manufacturing projects. Indeed, some projects, like the Boeing 787, put NASA to shame.

                    You are ill informed. Hundreds of millions of dollars are being invested every year by the private sector.
                    The government made it to the Moon during the Nixon Administration. How many times has private industry gone there?

                    Private industry is only interested in one thing: return on investment, and since the 1980's, return on investment in time for the next round of yearly bonuses. Space exploration is mainly for scientific reasons; albeit profits are install -- way down the road.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by DanS


                      This is absurd. The private sector is perfectly capable of managing large aerospace R&D and manufacturing projects. Indeed, some projects, like the Boeing 787, put NASA to shame.



                      You are ill informed. Hundreds of millions of dollars are being invested every year by the private sector.
                      The Boeing 747 is a commercial passenger plane, you can not compare that to space travel, for so many reasons its not even funny. I’ll just state the one that is obvious to you, Boeing wasn’t exactly a pioneer, they built a product for an existing market that demanded them.
                      Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
                      The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
                      The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Zkribbler


                        The government made it to the Moon during the Nixon Administration. How many times has private industry gone there?

                        Private industry is only interested in one thing: return on investment, and since the 1980's, return on investment in time for the next round of yearly bonuses. Space exploration is mainly for scientific reasons; albeit profits are install -- way down the road.
                        QFT
                        Modern man calls walking more quickly in the same direction down the same road “change.”
                        The world, in the last three hundred years, has not changed except in that sense.
                        The simple suggestion of a true change scandalizes and terrifies modern man. -Nicolás Gómez Dávila

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by OneFootInTheGrave


                          and "rare earth" position is just one of the optional answers. My bet is on "do not want to be detected"/"are too advanced for communication to be meaningfull" position
                          I'm going with "vast gaps in space/time" personally. Perhaps there is an advanced civilization in the galaxy, but they're all the way 'round the other side. Perhaps there isn't now, but there was one 2 million years ago. Perhaps there is one now, but we haven't detected their signals yet because said signals won't get here for another 2 million years... and so on and so forth.

                          -Arrian
                          grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

                          The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Zkribbler
                            The government made it to the Moon during the Nixon Administration. How many times has private industry gone there?
                            Thank you for proving my point. It was an idiotic allocation of capital (1) to go to the moon (2) in the manner that NASA did. After that, Nixon and the congress performed a mercy killing on the program. Why you would suggest a zombie-Apollo program for the private sector is beyond me.
                            I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Arrian


                              I'm going with "vast gaps in space/time" personally. Perhaps there is an advanced civilization in the galaxy, but they're all the way 'round the other side. Perhaps there isn't now, but there was one 2 million years ago. Perhaps there is one now, but we haven't detected their signals yet because said signals won't get here for another 2 million years... and so on and so forth.

                              -Arrian
                              My current favourite is that the event(s) that lead to oxygen respiring, eurkaroytic life are rare. While life may be common, we're going to spend a lot of time talking to slime and algae. But I'm a biochemist, of course I'd prefer the biological explanation.

                              Regardless, we seem to be the most advanced civilisation locally.
                              Exult in your existence, because that very process has blundered unwittingly on its own negation. Only a small, local negation, to be sure: only one species, and only a minority of that species; but there lies hope. [...] Stand tall, Bipedal Ape. The shark may outswim you, the cheetah outrun you, the swift outfly you, the capuchin outclimb you, the elephant outpower you, the redwood outlast you. But you have the biggest gifts of all: the gift of understanding the ruthlessly cruel process that gave us all existence [and the] gift of revulsion against its implications.
                              -Richard Dawkins

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by DanS


                                This is absurd. The private sector is perfectly capable of managing large aerospace R&D and manufacturing projects. Indeed, some projects, like the Boeing 787, put NASA to shame.



                                You are ill informed. Hundreds of millions of dollars are being invested every year by the private sector.
                                I didn't say that the private sector could not manage it. I said that they would not.

                                And hundreds of millions of dollars is chump change compared to what needs to be spent.

                                The apollo level funding made it possible for tens of thousands of engineers to go into aerospace, and the country reaped the benefits of that. But as soon as it was shut down all that built up infrastructure and skill just stopped. Boeing is living off of the past investments, because new graduates stopped coming off the line for aerospace a while ago.
                                Last edited by Whoha; January 9, 2008, 15:30.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X