Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lakota secedes from US

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Koyaanisqatsi


    It's pretty clear that it won't matter either way, though.
    I disagree. It matters a great deal what authority these "leaders" have and what they plan to do.

    Or do you expect to see UN peacekeepers setting up shop in North Dakota? That'd be funny...
    Again, what do the Lakotas plan to do? Any significant piece of territory not agreeing to US Gov rule would pose a considerable challenge.

    UN peacekeepers? Not a chance.

    Use of force? Possible.
    Last edited by Wezil; December 20, 2007, 18:24.
    "I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
    "I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Zkribbler


      I didn't find out until after my dad died and I was going through his papers. I knew I was 1/128 Cherokee, but I'm even more Lakota (okay, not much more).

      Did you have 48" pizza for dinner?

      Correct me if I'm wrong but that would mean you have 1 great-great-great-great-great-grandparent that was Cherokee.

      How long has your family been here?
      "I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
      "I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Wezil



        Did you have 48" pizza for dinner?

        Correct me if I'm wrong but that would mean you have 1 great-great-great-great-great-grandparent that was Cherokee.

        How long has your family been here?
        If you assume 30 years between each generation that only takes it back to 1827 or there abouts. It's not that implausible.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Geronimo


          If you assume 30 years between each generation that only takes it back to 1827 or there abouts. It's not that implausible.
          I prefaced with a "Correct me if I'm wrong..." for a reason. I wasn't entirely sure on the math to start with. I come up with something late 1700's.

          Quite possible. Zkrib isn't Oerdin so I won't demand proof.
          "I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
          "I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain

          Comment


          • #20
            The real question is how many casinos do they have?
            Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
            Iain Banks missed deadline due to Civ | The eyes are the groin of the head. - Dwight Schrute.
            One more turn .... One more turn .... | WWTSD

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Geronimo


              If you assume 30 years between each generation that only takes it back to 1827 or there abouts. It's not that implausible.
              Usually, 20 years is assumed to be a generation.

              I can trace some ancestors back to the time of the Revolution. The Lakota and Cherokee breaches of the family have obviosly been here longer.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Zkribbler


                Usually, 20 years is assumed to be a generation.

                I can trace some ancestors back to the time of the Revolution. The Lakota and Cherokee breaches of the family have obviosly been here longer.
                20 years is indeed usually done but by showing that it works even for the historically very large gap of 30 years it's clear that there is no remarkable issue with the 1/128 ancestry claim.

                Comment


                • #23
                  You notice it's not Comanches getting uppity.
                  Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
                  "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
                  He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Lakota secedes from US

                    Originally posted by Koyaanisqatsi
                    In a 'Huh? Can they do that?' type of moment:
                    Why not? The US supports secessionists elsewhere declaring independence against international law. Perhaps Russia, China and India will decide to recognise the new state.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Wezil
                      Again, what do the Lakotas plan to do? Any significant piece of territory not agreeing to US Gov rule would pose a considerable challenge.
                      I don't think its all that many people, though. And, of course, US authorities would ignore it. I mean, really, it is still US land, we just allow them to have tribal government there. They still have to abide by federal law. So, people without drivers' licenses will still go to jail and those that refuse to pay taxes will have liens on their houses, etc.
                      “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                      - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Wezil



                        Did you have 48" pizza for dinner?

                        Correct me if I'm wrong but that would mean you have 1 great-great-great-great-great-grandparent that was Cherokee.

                        How long has your family been here?
                        Well, if one of his ancestors is Cherokee, then his family has been here for quite a while
                        THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
                        AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
                        AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
                        DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Imran -

                          Well of course that's why I wondered how far they are prepared to go. If they declare independence in name only but take no meaningful steps to assert it then I agree, the gov will do nothing. If they start blocking highways into/out of "sovereign" territory, charge tolls, etc, the gov can't just ignore it.
                          "I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
                          "I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by LordShiva


                            Well, if one of his ancestors is Cherokee, then his family has been here for quite a while
                            Not necessarily. They weren't wiped out LordShiva.

                            He could concievably be 2nd generation and have a parent that is Cherokee. That wasn't the issue.

                            It was the 1/128 that got my attention. You have to go back many generations to get that small a fraction.
                            "I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
                            "I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Annex their lands. As any Civ player knows, no treaty = war

                              Barbarians
                              "The DPRK is still in a state of war with the U.S. It's called a black out." - Che explaining why orbital nightime pictures of NK show few lights. Seriously.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Crap! No more free Lakota culture.
                                “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                                "Capitalism ho!"

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X