I would suggest the difference is that, apart from the Vatican city, no predominantly christian country has been ruled as a theocracy where the religious fanatics are in charge of the nuthouse. There has always been some degree of effective secular government to moderate the religious extremists in predominantly christian countries.
Unfortunately secular governments in the ME have generally been ineffective or otherwise undermined over the last 50 years or so. In a situation where strict religious ideas are the only option on offer that is seen to offer resistance to outside (ie. foreign) dominance it should not be a surprise that those religious ideas are taken to extremes. It becomes a competition as to who can be most extreme in order to get noticed and gain support.
Unfortunately secular governments in the ME have generally been ineffective or otherwise undermined over the last 50 years or so. In a situation where strict religious ideas are the only option on offer that is seen to offer resistance to outside (ie. foreign) dominance it should not be a surprise that those religious ideas are taken to extremes. It becomes a competition as to who can be most extreme in order to get noticed and gain support.
Comment