Originally posted by DanS
Speaking from long personal experience, I disagree vehemently on the utility of heavy rail for carless people. Basically, you are my enemy -- you are doing what you can to stop me from getting around town in a pleasant, timely, and cost-effective manner.
Have you ever looked at population density maps of DC? Basically, wherever people are, metrorail isn't. It was a system built without regard to the city's needs. The city is fortunate that it is now making some use of metrorail despite the original plan.
Speaking from long personal experience, I disagree vehemently on the utility of heavy rail for carless people. Basically, you are my enemy -- you are doing what you can to stop me from getting around town in a pleasant, timely, and cost-effective manner.
Have you ever looked at population density maps of DC? Basically, wherever people are, metrorail isn't. It was a system built without regard to the city's needs. The city is fortunate that it is now making some use of metrorail despite the original plan.
But the USA doesnt consist only of NYC and DC. It includes Jacksonville, FL, and Columbus,Ohio and Bangor, Maine.
Even greater Washington, not all the poor people are in places like Georgia Avenue. Lots of poor folks scattered across the old, and not so old suburbs. And even the folks who live on Georgia avenue, if they are going E-W across town are likely to need to use the bus.
Im not your enemy. Geez. Im a pro-transit person, in general. (Oh, and my current position gives me no authority over any of this, I'll email you about that). I was a member of the subway club at Stuyvesant HS. I ride metrorail every weekday. Im NOT willing to toss about all Ive learned about the economics of transit, though.
Sometimes, but not in the general case. Tell that to IK Brunel and he'd throw you off a viaduct.
Comment