Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can we just THROW texas out of the union already?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Can we just THROW texas out of the union already?



    A TEXAS death-row inmate was executed after a local court refused to stay open an extra 20 minutes to hear an appeal.

    At 10am on September 25, the US Supreme Court announced it would review in early 2008 an appeal by two Kentucky death row inmates challenging the legality of the lethal injection.

    The same day, Michael Richard, 48, was due to receive the deadly cocktail at 6pm in southern Texas for the rape and murder of a woman in 1986.

    His attorneys said they rushed to draft an appeal to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the state's highest court for criminal cases.

    At 4.50pm, the lawyers called the court to ask it to remain open 20 more minutes after they were stalled by a computer malfunction.

    "We close at five,'' was the response from the court clerk, a quote widely reported by local media.

    In a last-ditch effort, Richard's attorneys took their case to the Supreme Court, which remains open for executions.

    The legal move delayed the execution by a few hours, but since the convict did not file his appeal with a local court first, his arguments were not accepted in Washington.

    The execution went ahead that evening and Richard was declared dead at 8.23pm.

    No other death row inmate has been executed since then.

    The court's behaviour angered a leading Texas daily newspaper, the Dallas Morning News, which expressed outrage in an editorial entitled "We Closed at 5".

    "Hastening the death of a man, even a bad one, because office personnel couldn't be bothered to bend bureaucratic procedure was a breathtakingly petty act and evinced a relish for death that makes the blood of decent people run cold,'' the newspaper said.

    On Tuesday, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals granted a stay of execution to convicted murderer Heliberto Chi, 28, a sign that it might step back while the US Supreme Court weighs the constitutionality of lethal injection.

    So far this year, 40 of the 41 people executed in the United States have been killed by lethal injection, with one choosing the electric chair.

    Most of the executions have taken place in Texas, which has put to death more than 400 people since the reinstatement of the death penalty in the country in 1976.

  • #2
    What's the problem?
    I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
    For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

    Comment


    • #3
      The problem is that the supreme court may rule the means of execution for the man unconstitutional, so the court could have stayed open for 20 damn extra minutes to hear an appeal which may have changed this mans fate, or at least delayed his death for another year.

      The problem is the judiciary in Texas is eager to kill everyone they can get their hands on.

      "Courts have rules"-I am well aware. I worked a low level clerical position in a court for a few months. I can't claim it gave me massive expertise, but it let me see the functionings of my state court system firsthand. Even the biggest bastard judge in the court I worked at would of given the man a stay of execution till the NEXT damn day to hear the appeal, even if they would not stay open for 20 extra minutes.

      Comment


      • #4
        Courthouse filing windows are known for this.

        Definition of a deadline: Cross over the line, you're dead.

        Comment


        • #5
          A little leeway, even a stay of execution for ONE day to hear the appeal is required by human decency.

          Reading about this case makes my blood boil. I am filled with rage with no outlet.

          Comment


          • #6
            The problem is the judiciary in Texas is eager to kill everyone they can get their hands on.
            the problem is the attorneys didn't get their work done on time and are looking for someone else to blame.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by DinoDoc
              What's the problem?
              "Hastening the death of a man, even a bad one, because office personnel couldn't be bothered to bend bureaucratic procedure was a breathtakingly petty act and evinced a relish for death that makes the blood of decent people run cold,'' the newspaper said.


              "I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
              "I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain

              Comment


              • #8
                This is not an issue of "on time". The Supreme court did not make its ruling till that morning. The attorneys were unable to make it in time to file on the same day, that is not unreasonable, nor it is an issue of their lazyness or negligence.

                The lawyers had to file on the same day this occured.

                The Supreme court taking up the issue of the constitutionality of lethal injection is big news and some courts have already put a morotorium on new executions till the issue is resolved, considering it is life or death. Thats right, the case is not even decided but only because it is being decided, some courts put a stay on all executions.

                Why? Because the constitutionality of lethal injection is in question and they want to wait till it is decided instead of killing people in an inhumane way.

                Texas responds by putting its fingers in it's ears and saying "la la la la" I can't hear you.

                Comment


                • #9
                  We're not talking about paying your parking ticket on time here.
                  "I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure." - Clarence Darrow
                  "I didn't attend the funeral, but I sent a nice letter saying I approved of it." - Mark Twain

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Vesayen
                    A little leeway, even a stay of execution for ONE day to hear the appeal is required by human decency.
                    Why? He's guilty and even they admit it and the rules were well known to the lawyers and should have been followed. The fact they openly admit they believe in his guilt is likely thr reason they were "late."
                    I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                    For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      The problem isn't the court's, it's that incompetent attorneys couldn't pull an all-nighter or two even when a man's life was on the line.

                      I guess you get what you pay for.
                      Unbelievable!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        This is not an issue of "on time". The Supreme court did not make its ruling till that morning. The attorneys were unable to make it in time to file on the same day, that is not unreasonable, nor it is an issue of their lazyness or negligence.
                        You're the attorney. Get on your computer and:
                        Pull of copy of caption page of the case.
                        Change title to "Request for Stay."
                        Open paragraph: To the Honorable Court [blah, blah].
                        Write "Background":
                        Then "On mo/day/yr, defendant ___ was convicted of murder and senteced to death by lethal injection. (See, Exh. 1.) Earlier today, the U.S. Surpreme Court granted a writ of cert. on the question of whether death by lethal injection violates the Cruel & Unusual Punishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution. (See, Exh. 2.) The execution of defendant ___ is set for 6 p.m. tonight. (See, Exh. 3.) Due to the pending review of the constitutionally of the means selected by the State of Texas to execute defendant _____, defendant ____ hereby requests his execution be stay for the pendency of the proceedings before the U.S. Supreme Court.
                        Respectfully submitted,"
                        Write todays date & sign it.
                        Attach the 3 exhibits.
                        Send it in.

                        15 minutes....

                        But the attorney undoubted chose to get fancy, take all day writing the brief, and then they either had a computer foul-up like they said, or traffic was bad, or they sent it back for one too many re-writes. They made the blunder...and every U.S. attorney knows that filing windows don't stay open late. EVER!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by DinoDoc
                          What's the problem?
                          Are you a bot?
                          Only feebs vote.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Texas is ****ed up!
                            “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.”
                            "Capitalism ho!"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Can we just THROW texas out of the union already?

                              We're leaving as fast as we can.
                              Life is not measured by the number of breaths you take, but by the moments that take your breath away.
                              "Hating America is something best left to Mobius. He is an expert Yank hater.
                              He also hates Texans and Australians, he does diversify." ~ Braindead

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X