Guess who has the biggest bombs of them all NOW?

[Serb]

Originally posted by Lonestar


I submit that a bomb so big you can just shove it out the back of a cargo plane is, in fact, awesome.

I submit that a fact that you don't have a bomber powerfull enough to carry your biggest conventional bomb is a proof that your airforce sucks.
Besides, Russian bomb weights as much as your MOAB, it is carried by strategic bomber Tu-160, but at the same time - it is four times more powerfull than your bomb.
So, yeah - you suck

[Serb]

Originally posted by Lonestar
I know, the ****ing Czechs have recorded the sounds B-2s and F-117s make, and are pitching a sensor network to track them thusly.

Your B-2 and F-117 are not a problem for our S-300 and S-400 and currently we are testing a new generation of SAMs that will be a ten times more capable than S-300.
So, go ahead - try us. Don't be shy, come get some.

[Serb]

Originally posted by Lonestar
Woohoo. Add more gasoline to to a FAE. Real technological leap there.

Our bomb weights as much as yours, but four times as powerfull. We use a different "gasoline" in our bomb. It contains much more advanced powder (but more likely suspension) than your H-6.

Four times more advanced to be exact.

[DaShi]

We don't publicize our most advanced bombs.

[Serb]

Originally posted by Kuciwalker


I thought they were our allies

I'll tell you more - their method to detect a stealth plane is not the only one to exist (and not the most efficient).
Yankees used a Russian (ex-Soviet) scientist Petr Ufimtsev to create their stealth planes. In his latter works he explained how to efficiently detect such planes. My congrats to Americans for billions of wasted USD

I hope (and almost sure) you use Russian scientists, as well, to create your anti-missile shield. It's a great way to waste a taxpayers money

[Serb]

Originally posted by DaShi
We don't publicize our most advanced bombs.

You do.

We don't

[Riesstiu IV]

Originally posted by Serb


I'll tell you more - their method to detect a stealth planes are not the only one to exist (and not the most efficient).
Yankees hired and used a Russian (ex-Soviet) designer Petr Ufimtsev to create their stealth planes. In his latter works he explained how to efficiently detect such planes. My congrats to Americans for billions of wasted USD
I hope (and almost sure) you use Russian scientists as well for your anti-missile shield. It's a great way to spend a taxpayers money

We just got serbed! Better surrender to our slavic overlords while we still can.

[Serb]

Originally posted by Riesstiu IV


We just got serbed!

I like it have to memorize that.

Better surrender to our slavic overlords while we still can.

[Serb]

French approach

[Lonestar]

Originally posted by Serb


I submit that a fact that you don't have a bomber powerfull enough to carry your biggest conventional bomb is a proof that your airforce sucks.

Why go for area effect weapons when precision is the way to go? And in any case, worse comes to worse we can just pull some "Big Belly" B-52s out of storage.

Area effect weapons are for *******s who can't plot artillery or bomb runs accurately...like the Russians.

Besides, Russian bomb weights as much as your MOAB, it is carried by strategic bomber Tu-160, but at the same time - it is four times more powerfull than your bomb.
So, yeah - you suck

Yeah, but our bomb is more likely to his the target.

Besides, the USAF is shifting towards "loitering" over targets, which is why stuff like the Reaper is getting fast-tracked.

Your B-2 and F-117 are not a problem for our S-300 and S-400 and currently we are testing a new generation of SAMs that will be a ten times more capable than S-300.
So, go ahead - try us. Don't be shy, come get some.

Whatever you say, killer. If the S-300 is so **** hot, how come the Turks can inter Greek airspace without worrying about being "pinged" by their fire control radar?

Our bomb weights as much as yours, but four times as powerfull. We use a different "gasoline" in our bomb. It contains much more advanced powder (but more likely suspension) than your H-6.

Four times more advanced to be exact.

Oh noes he has more advanced gasoline! Guess I'll just have call in a JDAM strike, which will let me provide fire support for my guys without, you know, killing them when they're caught in the blast wave.

[Riesstiu IV]

Originally posted by Serb

I like it have to memorize that.

You like? I'm planning on making a movie script titled, "You Got Serbed." The plot focuses on a Serbian breakdancing crew, who take part in a street dancing competition that determines which ethnic group will rule the former Yugoslavia.

So far everybody thinks its a terrible idea.

[Serb]

Originally posted by Lonestar
Why go for area effect weapons when precision is the way to go? And in any case, worse comes to worse we can just pull some "Big Belly" B-52s out of storage.

Yeah, why not to resurrect a Wright brothers airplane?
Why not to resurrect a Sherman Firefly as your modern MBT?

Area effect weapons are for *******s who can't plot artillery or bomb runs accurately...like the Russians.

Then why you created yours, if you are not ****ers?
We can plot our bomb/missiles/artillery projectiles accurately (btw, WE pioneered precision artillery projectiles, not you) but it doesn't mean we don't need an anti-personel munition with a blast radius of 300 meters (comparing to yours 137 meters).

Yeah, but our bomb is more likely to his the target.

Who told you so?

Besides, the USAF is shifting towards "loitering" over targets, which is why stuff like the Reaper is getting fast-tracked.

Try to loitering inside the Russian airspace and we'll see what happen next. Too bad you can't ask Gary Powers about his experience with loitering in Soviet airspace.

Whatever you say, killer. If the S-300 is so **** hot, how come the Turks can inter Greek airspace without worrying about being "pinged" by their fire control radar?

I have no idea wtf are you talking about, but who told you that:
a) their weren't detected
b) Greek S-300 batteries cover all Greek territory
c) the Turkish planes weren't shot because of consequences (war)?

Oh noes he has more advanced gasoline!

Yeah, right, if the same mass of "gasoline" produces the four times more powerfull blast, than surely it's not advanced!

Guess I'll just have call in a JDAM strike, which will let me provide fire support for my guys without, you know, killing them when they're caught in the blast wave.

Blah-blah-blah.
Then why to design and produce your MOABs if you have presicion munition with much lesser blast radius in your inventory?

Close air support = area effect strike?

[Serb]

Originally posted by Riesstiu IV


You like? I'm planning on making a movie script titled, "You Got Serbed." The plot focuses on a Serbian breakdancing crew, who take part in a street dancing competition that determines which ethnic group will rule the former Yugoslavia.

So far everybody thinks its a terrible idea.

I'm not a Serb, silly.
I'm a Russian, whose first name starts with "Ser" and the last name starts with "B".

[Heresson]

Originally posted by Riesstiu IV


We just got serbed! Better surrender to our slavic overlords while we still can.

Slavic Overlords = Poles
Russians = Mongolians
Serb =

[Riesstiu IV]

Originally posted by Serb

I'm not a Serb, silly.
I'm a Russian, whose first name starts with "Ser" and the last name starts with "B".

Makes sense. I was wondering why the Serbian flag was upside down in your avatar.