Guess who has the biggest bombs of them all NOW?

[Serb]

Well, probably because it's a Russian flag

[Serb]

And, somebody shot a Polish diablo, please.

[Lonestar]

Originally posted by Serb

Yeah, why not to resurrect a Wright brothers airplane?
Why not to resurrect a Sherman Firefly as your modern MBT?

And yet, it's still the best bomb truck in the world.

How combat-proven are Russian strategic bombers? I forget

Then why you created yours, if you are not ****ers?

You mind why would we test a really big bomb the week before we invade Iraq, and then televise it? I haven't a clue.

We can plot our bomb/missiles/artillery projectiles accurately (btw, WE pioneered precision artillery projectiles, not you)

You pioneered precision munitions because your guys were unable to use this thing called "Math" to accurately use their artillery. The US created the very concept of T.O.T.

but it doesn't mean we don't need an anti-personel munition with a blast radius of 300 meters (comparing to yours 137 meters).

If your opponents feel that they can hang out in the open like that when fighting you, that speaks to how much of a threat your own support is.

Who told you so?

How many C-130s have been shot down since Vietnam?

Try to loitering inside the Russian airspace and we'll see what happen next. Too bad you can't ask Gary Powers about his experience with loitering in Soviet airspace.

You're seriously comparing a incident in the '50s to today? Wow. If that's the case then I get to disparage the Soviet Fighting Man for his skill in WW2.

I have no idea wtf are you talking about, but who told you that:
a) their weren't detected
b) Greek S-300 batteries cover all Greek territory
c) the Turkish planes weren't shot because of consequences (war)?

Janes.

Yeah, right, if the same mass of "gasoline" produces the four times more powerfull blast, than surely it's not advanced!

You have the math to back up that statement, of cours.e

Blah-blah-blah.
Then why to design and produce your MOABs if you have presicion munition with much lesser blast radius in your inventory?

And even better question would be "when has the US used the MOAB in combat?". Never? Huh, I wonder why that is?

Oh, right, because area affect weapons like that aren't that useful to countries whose militaries use precision munitions.

Close air support = area effect strike?

Again, why would we need such a weapon? Which of our enemies hangs out in the open like that? Especially since your "ZOMG STARTIGIC BOMEBR" would be so damn high up it wouldn't be accurate. A low and slow C-130 would be more accurate, as would fighter-craft using cluster munitions.

[Patroklos]

Are Serb and Pakroklos twins seperated at birth?

What did I tell you about your gay fantacies Kid?

[Riesstiu IV]

Originally posted by Heresson



Slavic Overlords = Poles
Russians = Mongolians
Serb =

Sorry but Poles just aren't Slavic overlord material these days. Maybe back 15th or 16th century.

[DaShi]

Originally posted by Serb

You do.

We don't

No.

You do.

We don't

[Serb]

Yes.

We don't

You do.

What a mature conversation we have here. No?

[Serb]

Originally posted by Patroklos




What did I tell you about your gay fantacies Kid?

Hi, Patroklos,
I have a GaygoalEarth satellite picture of your ship!

[Serb]

[Patroklos]

[Serb]

[Lonestar]

Serb, you got World in Conflict?

[Serb]

No. Should I?

[DaShi]

Originally posted by Serb
Yes.

We don't

You do.

What a mature conversation we have here. No?

That was kind of the point of my last post.

[Lonestar]

Originally posted by Serb
No. Should I?

Possibly. I think it's right up your alley.