Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"Unconquered" nations

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    A White Russian conquered and ruled Mongolia before the Soviets drove him out.
    THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
    AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
    AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
    DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

    Comment


    • #17
      Well, Adalbertus already brought up the point of defining nation, and I think I an bringing up the point of defining conquest. Maybe the Chinese, Manchu, and Russians claimed soveringty over Mongol lands, but did they have control over Mongol life? Cause those tribes don't seem to have been too affected by these claims of land ownership.

      And of course, what about what Slade Wilson said, which is correct, isnce its inception as an independent self-governing state, the United states has never seen foreign rule, though neither have Canda, Australia, or New Zealand. then of course, you get states like BRazil, or Indonesia, which have also never seen foreing control since their inception, but what does that mean, and do they even constitute "nations"?
      If you don't like reality, change it! me
      "Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
      "it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
      "Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw

      Comment


      • #18
        Well the answer certainly isn't France
        Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.
        Douglas Adams (Influential author)

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by GePap

          Maybe the Chinese, Manchu, and Russians claimed soveringty over Mongol lands, but did they have control over Mongol life? Cause those tribes don't seem to have been too affected by these claims of land ownership.
          To the extent that the Manchu Empire grew tired of the Mongol Dzungars and wiped them out, yes.



          The homelands of the Mongols were eventually divided between the Manchus and the Tsarist Russian Empire, with the Russians gradually encroaching more and more on old Mongol lands and Manchu holdings as the Manchu Dynasty dwindled in power in the 19th Century.

          Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

          ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

          Comment


          • #20
            Most of the "new" post-colonial nations (Africa, The Caribbean) were never conquered. Screwed by the Free West or the USSR, sure, but never conquered.
            Within weeks they'll be re-opening the shipyards
            And notifying the next of kin
            Once again...

            Comment


            • #21
              I think there could be a case for claiming that being defeated/colonised might have actually aided a number of nations by stripping out complacent and decadent aristocracies/plutocracies and creating space for more dynamic growth. India is a good example- an emerging superpower.
              The genesis of the "evil Finn" concept- Evil, evil Finland

              Comment


              • #22
                Was it really that effective at destroying the caste system? I thought India still had lingering problems with it.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Globalization is making a world ever flatter. Differences between cultures are diminishing fast, but lots of local flavors still remain.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Also, is this question applicable to nomads like Berbers or Bedouins? (and I guess, the Mongols)
                    Berbers were subdued partly by Romans, and entirely by Islam. Well, they joined, but not after a heavy fight. Bedouins were subdued by islam too, and different parts of them by other mights.

                    Originally posted by LordShiva
                    qtf

                    Originally posted by Slade Wilson
                    United States was never conquered and mostly won its wars AFAIK
                    because it is new. Southern states were conquered anyway.

                    I think the question depends of internal conquest.
                    I mean, Constantinople was never conquered until IV crusade, right? Wrong, if you count civil wars.
                    Egypt remained in muslim hands until Napoleon. Sure, it was conquered a couple of times: liberated by Abbasids (not quite conquest), conquered by Fatimids (again, partly thanks to a deal and the administration remained largely unchanged), by Ayyubids (again, Saladin started officially as a visier of Fatimids, though supported from abroad, so it was not complete overthrow, mamluks were internal force, Turks left the country to mamluks to a large extent... and Napoleon's conquest was temporary etc.
                    "I realise I hold the key to freedom,
                    I cannot let my life be ruled by threads" The Web Frogs
                    Middle East!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Japan? I don't know if simply being occupied, with the intent to return it to self-government, counts as being "conquered."

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Kuciwalker
                        Japan? I don't know if simply being occupied, with the intent to return it to self-government, counts as being "conquered."
                        Teh Ainu were conquered
                        THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
                        AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
                        AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
                        DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Kuciwalker
                          Switzerland?
                          the french attacked them (in 1799 IIRC) and later set up the 'helvetian republic' as a puppet state.
                          "The Christian way has not been tried and found wanting, it has been found to be hard and left untried" - GK Chesterton.

                          "The most obvious predicition about the future is that it will be mostly like the past" - Alain de Botton

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Teh Romans conquered them, too.
                            THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
                            AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
                            AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
                            DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Swiss cantons were also parts of the Holy Roman Empire and Duchy of Burgundy too, and of Savoy.
                              Vive la liberte. Noor Inayat Khan, Dachau.

                              ...patriotism is not enough. I must have no hatred or bitterness towards anyone. Edith Cavell, 1915

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Afghanistan?
                                DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X