Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is this graph correct?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Do you recall that because you were there at the time?

    Molly, LOTM - scientific advance over a period of time is not well-represented by any singular example.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Barnabas
      By the way, if I recall correctly the greek period and hellenistic period centered in Alexandria were far "richer" in scientific advances han the "roman" period
      Alexandria was founded by Alexander, who a few years later, died. With him, the "Helenistic period" died out; his empire was carved into three parts; and his general Ptolomy got the Egyptian part with Alexander.

      So, I don't see how you can have a "hellenistic period centered in Alexandria"

      Comment


      • #18
        Dark age is what happened to the greeks or the indus valley civilization after the invasions/migrations they suffered, lots of knowledge was lost andthe art of writing was lost for centuries.

        The church actually had a positive role preserving knowledge and expanding it to the barbarians
        I need a foot massage

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Zkribbler


          Alexandria was founded by Alexander, who a few years later, died. With him, the "Helenistic period" died out; his empire was carved into three parts; and his general Ptolomy got the Egyptian part with Alexander.

          So, I don't see how you can have a "hellenistic period centered in Alexandria"

          I meant the kingdoms ruled by Alexander´s generals and their dinasties in egypt, asia and greece


          The end of the Hellenistic period is generally seen as 31 BC, when the kingdom of Ptolemaic Egypt was utterly defeated by the Romans at the Battle of Actium. Octavian (Augustus) defeated Marc Antony at Actium, as a result, Egypt's last ruler, Cleopatra, (circa 30 BC) committed suicide and her kingdom was annexed by Octavian.
          I need a foot massage

          Comment


          • #20
            Now THAT makes a lot of sense!

            Alexandria had its famed Library

            Comment


            • #21
              1 CE? Do they mean 1 AD?
              I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Zkribbler


                Alexandria was founded by Alexander, who a few years later, died. With him, the "Helenistic period" died out; his empire was carved into three parts; and his general Ptolomy got the Egyptian part with Alexander.

                So, I don't see how you can have a "hellenistic period centered in Alexandria"
                This is ass-backwards: the Hellenistic period begins with Alexander's death and lasts till the Roman annexation of the last successor kingdom, namely Ptolemaic Egypt with Alexandria.
                Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?

                It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
                The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok

                Comment


                • #23
                  Should I put in a link to my Conservapedia thread??

                  Yeah, in PC-speech CE = AD (Common Era = Anno Dominae)

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    It's "Anno Domini".
                    Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?

                    It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
                    The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Last Conformist
                      It's "Anno Domini".
                      Good guess though, wasn't it?

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Fibonacci writes in his famous book Liber abaci (1202):-
                        Whoa, he's been around for a long time.

                        Captain of Team Apolyton - ISDG 2012

                        When I was younger I thought curfews were silly, but now as the daughter of a young woman, I appreciate them. - Rah

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Dark Ages were certainly a period of stagnation in Europe but not a thousand years worth, probably a few hundred at most.

                          Its speculated that if the Pre-Socratic philosophers (really the first true Scientists) like Anaxagoras had flourished the Renaissance could have happened more then two thousand years ago. Its all about the social institutions and norms that either encourage or stifle scientific advancement and those circumstances have always been hard to maintain.
                          Companions the creator seeks, not corpses, not herds and believers. Fellow creators, the creator seeks - those who write new values on new tablets. Companions the creator seeks, and fellow harvesters; for everything about him is ripe for the harvest. - Thus spoke Zarathustra, Fredrick Nietzsche

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I think, regarding muslim contributions to science, more important than preserving greek knowledge, was their expansion to the west and east (from spain and morocco to central asia, india and the malay islands), because it made technological exchange between east and west much faster than ever before
                            I need a foot massage

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Impaler[WrG]
                              Dark Ages were certainly a period of stagnation in Europe but not a thousand years worth, probably a few hundred at most.
                              The Dark Age is often incorrectly used inerchagebly with the Middle Age. They were really differeent periods. The line between the 2 is ussually said to be 1000 AD or 1066 AD (the Dark Ages being first of course). Europe almopst recovered from the The Fall of Rome, but then the Vikings came extending the Dark Age.
                              USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA! USA!
                              The video may avatar is from

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                but then the Vikings came extending the Dark Age.


                                Hey!

                                Very few people were complaining at the time.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X