Originally posted by Flhaus
They are drawing down on a more stable and sane footing due to the pressure from congress. The failure resides on the surrender side of the aisle. He is trying to satisfy them while achieving the objective. When your eggs are busted, you might as well make an omelet.
They are drawing down on a more stable and sane footing due to the pressure from congress. The failure resides on the surrender side of the aisle. He is trying to satisfy them while achieving the objective. When your eggs are busted, you might as well make an omelet.
Stop shooting the messenger. Try to be less emotional and more objective about this, then please read this post.
This is leadership.
To be fair, I might have been wrong in the last paragraph. You see, it also could be that the administration is now cynically lying to American people about what they're going to do in order to buy more breathing room. It wouldn't be the first time Bush's image is helped by anonymous lie-filled "leaks" within the administration.
You really are clueless since it is actually the Republican members of Congress who have told Bush that unless things change radically soon they're going to have to vote against the war starting next May. Republican members of Congress up for election next year are practically crapping their pants believing that unless something is done about the war they're going to get the axe just like in the last election. These are guys who expected life time secure positions due to gerrymandering (both sides do that) but the war and Bush's unpopularity (down in the 20's now) is putting them in jeopardy. Republicans in Congress have all pretty much told Bush that if by May 2008 (giving them half a year to campaign) if there isn't success or a substantial draw down then they'll vote with the Democrats to save their own skins.

Comment