The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Reduced usage at a cost of economic activity is my problem.
CAFE minimizes that economic hit and is a shorter means to get there.
Look if you are going to say we have to find alternatives to gasoline to power transportation as would be the case with draconian oil taxes, then you'll be forced at looking to retool fleets to biodiesel or ethanol or any of a host of other technologies. That in of itself will take forever to work out between retooling the fleets and coming up with a production and distribution system for the new alternative fuels. While improving existing fleet standards is a relatively doable thing while the requisite technology is being developed, existing reserves explored and drilled, etc.
The point being is that the POTUS should be highlighting goals to reduce foreign oil dependence complete with milestones and goals. A timetable to withdrawl if you will.
Apples and Apples man. Youre comparing under a tax eliminating ALL oil consumption. For CAFE your assuming presumably a modest reduction in consumption. Of course that will have less impact. A 100%. What CAFE standards are you talking about? Double current new vehicles? Thats going to take awhile, OR be very costly, or both. You raise taxes you will impact the fuel usage of new vehicles via incentives, plus incent a lot of other things that can reduce consumption.
And whats with this reduction in economic activity? You tax one sector, its taken up by other sectors. People buy less of goods that use a lot of oil, or transport, and buy more of something else. Is that its a tax and takes money out of the economy? You dont want the deficit reduced at this point. Fine, cut another tax. Cut income taxes. Whatever. Stimulate other sectors.
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
Originally posted by Arrian
I very much do want to deal with the deficits. But that is indeed another discussion.
-Arrian
No. It's the same discussion when you start deciding how much the tax should be. You might as well consider how much revenue you are going to generate.
I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Jon Miller- I AM.CANADIAN
GENERATION 35: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation. Social experiment.
Originally posted by AAHZ
there is almost nothing i enjoy more on 'Poly than a good Kidicious debate! carry-on...
You dont understand. Hes right on this one.
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
Originally posted by Jon Miller
Gas taxes at the pump are regressive
JM
so make it rev neutral by using the funds to cut SS taxes on the poor and expand the EITC.
"A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber
Actually, Kid's been almostly totally sane here AAHZ. There was a short rant about giving money to corps, and I thought he was gonna go off the deep end there, but he pulled back and has stuck to basic econ.
No. It's the same discussion when you start deciding how much the tax should be. You might as well consider how much revenue you are going to generate.
Sure. But we're discussing a specific issue here, and it makes things easier if we consider the gas tax in a vacuum.
Comment