The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
You can't just label everything you disagree with socialist. How can someone continue conversations with you when you act this silly.
Kid, now you are being ridiculous. I know the difference between classic liberalism (i.e., a concern for the poor) which has its origins in Christianity and socialism which speaks of the "social contract," class warfare and economic equality. The classic liberal would be pro-family. The socialist is anti-family because the socialist wants everyone to be dependent upon the state.
We need Bush to say things that you say so that America can truly understand the position of the republicans on Capitalism vs. Freedom.
Bush is despised by all because he has no fundamental viewpoint. Compassionate conservatism is not conservative and only mildly compassionate. It is despised by both left and right.
Two things in parallel never make contact with eachother.
Prove it
Oh, that it false math mathically (the two lines could have the same equation). But it pretty clear what he really meant. I think that the really agruement boils down to...
A) feminism is wrong. For example it states falsehoods like men and women are biologically equal in the things that 'really matter' (like drive).
Note: I don't know if that is true or not. I do know that women act differently from men. Wheather the cause of this is the patirarchy or biology does not really matter to me much in my day to day life. I live in extremly poltically polorisd place to so I always vote for the same side anyways.
B) Nothing good can come from falsehoods. The rest of the 'agruements' are don't really exist and are made by lazy writing (to be fair they are not useing these agruments).
I think that all nomative things are negtive and postive. anseehms postion is negtive to because he clams that feminism is wrong. So to say that feminism is bad because it is 'negtive' is wrong. I think he used negtive to mean that it can not do anything good (mainly because its wrong).
The pro-faminly things is all BS if any side uses it. The state is made up of faimlys. Both sides think they are doing what is best for the state and family. So they think that they are pro-faimly AND pro-state and the other side is not. To be fair Ned just used pro-faimly as shorthand for postions he already posted.
“...This means GCA won 7 battles against our units, had Horsemen retreat from 2 battles against NMs, and lost 0 battles.” --Jon Shafer 1st ISDG
Edit: Never mind my 'cannot post their agruments' idea. Even if the choices are made for bad reasons and are depenant the partiarcy keeping them on they still reflect what socity thinks. Socity may be wrong and the feminists are againist. But sometimes the right thing to do is be against the ideas of socity.
If you say someone's ideas are wrong your impling that they are stuiped.
Lime roots and treachery!
"Eventually you're left with a bunch of unmemorable posters like Cyclotron, pretending that they actually know anything about who they're debating pointless crap with." - Drake Tungsten
Originally posted by Kuciwalker
I find it amusing that it took you a couple tries to get it.
I apologize for thinking you actually had something to say more than "lol boobs." Clearly I should not have expected anything productive or contributive on your part in a serious discussion.
Lime roots and treachery!
"Eventually you're left with a bunch of unmemorable posters like Cyclotron, pretending that they actually know anything about who they're debating pointless crap with." - Drake Tungsten
Comment