Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What computer games do you have installed right now?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Originally posted by Odin


    agreed. And this from a person who liked civ3 (but quickly grew bored of it).

    Comment


    • #77
      AoE 3 + Warchiefs
      Civ 4 + Warlords

      AoM
      Atari Anniversary Edition (Millipede )
      Call of Duty
      Civ 2
      Deus Ex
      Deus Ex 2
      Diablo 2 + LoD
      Doom 3
      Dungeon Siege 2
      Fallout
      Fallout 2
      Fallout Tactics
      Far Cry
      Ghost Recon
      Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter
      Guild Wars
      Kohan Ahriman's Gift
      Kohan II
      Morrowind
      Neverwinter Nights
      Panzers Phase I
      Rainbow Six Raven Shield + Athena Sword
      Steel Panthers World at War
      System Shock 2
      UT 2004
      Warcraft III + Frozen Throne
      X-com (but I think it was from a few yrs ago when I had and still used my W98SE partition)
      Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
      Iain Banks missed deadline due to Civ | The eyes are the groin of the head. - Dwight Schrute.
      One more turn .... One more turn .... | WWTSD

      Comment


      • #78
        Why so few? I think you should buy and install more games
        Let us be lazy in everything, except in loving and drinking, except in being lazy – Lessing

        Comment


        • #79
          Well, I did uninstall these games before I got a 2nd hard drive. I could reinstall.

          AoE I + RoR
          Asteroids
          Dark Forces
          Duke Nukem 3D
          Half Life
          Heroes of Might & Magic III & IV
          Jedi Knight
          Panzer General II
          SWAT 3
          Unreal Tournament
          Warlords 3

          Actually, I need to upgrade my computer before buying more games (or at least ones it can't handle now).
          Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
          Iain Banks missed deadline due to Civ | The eyes are the groin of the head. - Dwight Schrute.
          One more turn .... One more turn .... | WWTSD

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by Dis
            You need to buy these games when they are still in stores.
            Or wait until the abandonware principle kicks in. Either way. I might move into the 21st century when I have a computer that can handle new games. The one I have would explode if it even thought about running Civ4.
            1011 1100
            Pyrebound--a free online serial fantasy novel

            Comment


            • #81
              Haven't installed much since the last reformat. Lemme see:

              Civilization III
              Civilization IV
              Alpha Centauri
              UFO: Enemy Unknown (aka XCOM: UFO Defense)
              Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?

              It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
              The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok

              Comment


              • #82
                Vanguard: Saga of Heroes (current no. 1)
                World of Warcraft + expansion
                Medieval II: Total War
                Football Manager 2007
                Civ IV + Warlords
                Sid Meier's Railroads!
                Europa Universalis III
                Oblivion
                Heroes of Might and Magic V + Hammers of Fate expansion
                Lineage II (private server thingy - don't have a paid account)
                Trade Empires
                Kyodai Mahjongg
                EVE Online
                Galactic Civilizations II
                Colonization

                Asmodean
                Im not sure what Baruk Khazad is , but if they speak Judeo-Dwarvish, that would be "blessed are the dwarves" - lord of the mark

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by Odin
                  Originally posted by Wycoff
                  Europa Universalis 3

                  Civ 3 total (I must be the only person in the world who prefers Civ 3 to Civ 4. As a matter of fact, Civ 3 is my favorite installment of the series.)
                  QFT
                  Speaking of Erith:

                  "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by Provost Harrison


                    QFT


                    I just don't see what makes Civ 3 so terrible and Civ 4 so great. Maybe I was just getting bored with Civ by the time 4 rolled around.
                    I'm about to get aroused from watching the pokemon and that's awesome. - Pekka

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by Dis
                      those games look so complex. But I've always been wanting to try them. Now if I could find one real cheap. wonder how much eu2 costs now.
                      £12.50 here. Though you should still probably just get EU3.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Originally posted by Wycoff

                        I just don't see what makes Civ 3 so terrible and Civ 4 so great.
                        Much less strategic depth in the former.

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by DrSpike
                          Much less strategic depth in the former.
                          I wouldn't say much less. Some of the depth that was added took away from the fun. I disliked the whole unit upgrade system, because it added a degree of military micromanagement that I thought felt disjointed when compared to the grand scope of the game. Religion was a cool aspect, but it wasn't as game changing as I thought it would be. I thought that the new corruption/expansion penalty/ whatever they called it was just a flip side of the Civ 3 model, as it punished you for early expansion rather than later expansion. I preferred the era-based tech tree to the free form tech tree. There were some other aspects that I didn't like, but I forget what they were. I sold it a few months ago.
                          I'm about to get aroused from watching the pokemon and that's awesome. - Pekka

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by Wycoff

                            Religion was a cool aspect, but it wasn't as game changing as I thought it would be.
                            Really? You expected more than its effect on culture, other civs attitudes toward you, and if you discover a religion, use a great prophet to build the holy building, you get +1 gold per city with that religion?
                            Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. - Ben Franklin
                            Iain Banks missed deadline due to Civ | The eyes are the groin of the head. - Dwight Schrute.
                            One more turn .... One more turn .... | WWTSD

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              A (obviously former at this point ) friend recently divulged to me that he preferred Civ3 and previous to Civ4 because of the new city support model. The one that fixed ICS.

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Originally posted by Lord Avalon Really? You expected more than its effect on culture, other civs attitudes toward you, and if you discover a religion, use a great prophet to build the holy building, you get +1 gold per city with that religion?
                                Those were nice, but they just felt superficial. IMO, they chaged tactics more than they changed strategy. My gripes:

                                I never felt that my game was substantially more or less fun if I founded four religions or if I didn't found any. Part of the disappointment came from the fact that the religions were bland. It didn't matter if you were Jewish, Buddhist, etc. I know that it would have been problematic to implement, but it would have been nice if civs received different bonuses depending on the religion that they followed. For instance, Buddism could have generated added war weariness but less civil unrest.

                                I also didn't like that there wasn't more fluidity in the religious system. It seemed that later discovered religions like Islam were often neglected. It would have been nice if the newly founded religions would catch fire in the civs that founded it and in the surrounding civs, spreading regardless of whether the civ wanted it to spread and causing major problems when it did spread. I recognize that the involuntary spreading did happen, but that spreading didn't cause your civ any problems.
                                This took away from the experience of religious conflict.
                                Founding as many religions as possible was beneficial, because you could get the temple in your civ, spread it to all of your cities and those of the civs surrounding you, and reap the benefits. I thought that founding more than one religion should have caused at least short term problems within your civ and those surrounding you, maybe causing armed rebellions to rise, maybe causing some cities to break away from your civ to start their own, etc.

                                I also would have liked it if you got a certain amount of gold per city in which your state religion was founded, but that amount was reduced for every other religion in that city. You could persecute those non-state religions to increase the percentage of your preferred religion in that city, but doing so would hurt relations with other civs who had that religion as their state religion.

                                In short, I hoped that religion would fundamentally change the way the game worked. IMO, it changed the game somewhat, but not enough. Religious conflict and upheaval is nearly missing from this game, represented only by the moderately altered attitudes of other civs towards you. Religious strife within a civilization is conspicuously absent, aas is the turmoil caused by new faiths arising in territories that follow an older faith. I had fun founding my religions for awhile, but the novelty wore off.

                                My main reason for not liking Civ 4 as much was the new unit upgrade system. The fact that I found the religion system underwhelming was just a secondary factor in my decision to uninstall & sell the game.
                                Last edited by Wycoff; March 30, 2007, 10:02.
                                I'm about to get aroused from watching the pokemon and that's awesome. - Pekka

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X