Originally posted by Straybow
Straw man. We aren't talking about giving swords, much less guns or nukes, to anyone.
Do you have a point, or are you just trolling?
By the same logic of this measure, we should also find out how many people are battered to death with bats, tire-irons, fireplace pokers, shovels, picks, and assorted other tools and ban them if there are too many deaths.
Wait a minute, the article mentioned a victim who was first hacked with the sword and then run over with an automobile. So we should ban automobiles, too. I guarantee there are far more deliberate auto-pedestrian deaths than sword deaths.
Originally posted by Victor Galis
Using your logic, we should give all countries nuclear weapons because then we'd have no more war.
Using your logic, we should give all countries nuclear weapons because then we'd have no more war.
Straw man. We aren't talking about giving swords, much less guns or nukes, to anyone.
Do you have a point, or are you just trolling?
By the same logic of this measure, we should also find out how many people are battered to death with bats, tire-irons, fireplace pokers, shovels, picks, and assorted other tools and ban them if there are too many deaths.
Wait a minute, the article mentioned a victim who was first hacked with the sword and then run over with an automobile. So we should ban automobiles, too. I guarantee there are far more deliberate auto-pedestrian deaths than sword deaths.
I'm in the same parade as this guy.
Comment