Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Leftist youth groups conduct street battles with police in Copenhagen

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 68
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 24 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 44 68 template Next
  • #496
    Originally posted by Flubber


    Ahh-- does that right include the right to live exactly where they want?

    How would you feel if 8 homeless guys decided they were going to stay at your place right now? You don't know them but they want to be who they are .. .

    Do you call the police or do you welcome them or do you use violent means (with friends) to expel them?
    They had been using the facilites for 18 years. The place was built by the Left in 1890. And now it is demolished.

    Now how the **** is this about whether I should have to let homeless people stay at my house? WTF Flubber?!
    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

    Comment

    • #497
      Originally posted by Kidicious
      Interesting theory. So the lower rent is the less people work?
      less incentive = less motivation. teh FACT. The squatters threw a tantrum... and got spanked

      Hardly, you have no idea the thoughts that are racing through my mind.


      really? if they are anti-christian thoughts, you are taking this situation WAY out of context im afraid...
      The Wizard of AAHZ

      Comment

      • #498
        Originally posted by DinoDoc
        Kid: In your view, under what obligation were the Christian group to let the hooligans use their property?
        They should be obligated to leave people alone to go about their business instead of trying to make everyone like them.
        I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
        - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

        Comment

        • #499
          Originally posted by Kidicious


          What do I have to do to stop people from repeating this red herring? This is about more powerfull groups within the capitalist system using that system to force less powerfull groups out of their facilites.
          Would thosae be the same groups that gave them the use of the facility in the first place and then let them use it for free for years. Sounds like a sweet deal-- THey should have been grateful
          You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

          Comment

          • #500
            Originally posted by AAHZ


            less incentive = less motivation. teh FACT. The squatters threw a tantrum... and got spanked
            rent amt = incentive to rent

            wages = incentive to work
            I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
            - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

            Comment

            • #501
              Originally posted by Kidicious
              They should be obligated to leave people alone to go about their business instead of trying to make everyone like them.
              That doesn't answer the question. The Christians were the new owners of the property the hooligans claimed to care so much about yet couldn't be arsed to buy. Under what obligation were the new owners under to let squatters have continued use of the property?
              I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
              For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

              Comment

              • #502
                Originally posted by Flubber


                Would thosae be the same groups that gave them the use of the facility in the first place and then let them use it for free for years. Sounds like a sweet deal-- THey should have been grateful
                No it is not the same group. They were given the right to use the facility by the city. The city decided to sell it. Christians bought it cheap and wouldn't sell it. Instead they demolished it.
                I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                Comment

                • #503
                  Originally posted by Kidicious




                  Now how the **** is this about whether I should have to let homeless people stay at my house? WTF Flubber?!
                  Valid question-- They need a place to stay and they choose your house/apartment-- It doesn't have to be logical but its what they choose. They are definitely disadvantaged by society and their need is greater than yours. Shouldn't you allow them to stay as long as they want? Wouldn't asserting a property right be the heights of hypocrsy?
                  You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

                  Comment

                  • #504
                    Originally posted by DinoDoc
                    That doesn't answer the question. The Christians were the new owners of the property the hooligans claimed to care so much about yet couldn't be arsed to buy. Under what obligation were the new owners under to let squatters have continued use of the property?
                    If they don't want to fight they should be obligated. That's all I can answer for you.
                    I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                    - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                    Comment

                    • #505
                      rent amt = incentive to rent

                      wages = incentive to work


                      higher wages and cheaper goods? your economy would go broke so fast that the Earth would tilt backwards on its orbit...
                      The Wizard of AAHZ

                      Comment

                      • #506
                        Originally posted by Flubber


                        Valid question-- They need a place to stay and they choose your house/apartment-- It doesn't have to be logical but its what they choose. They are definitely disadvantaged by society and their need is greater than yours. Shouldn't you allow them to stay as long as they want? Wouldn't asserting a property right be the heights of hypocrsy?
                        WTF Flubber, they should have their own house. I don't know why you make me go through all this irrelevent stuff.
                        I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                        - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                        Comment

                        • #507
                          So there is no real obligation in your view. Only attempted violent coercion by the hooligans or punks as Pekka would say.
                          I make no bones about my moral support for [terrorist] organizations. - chegitz guevara
                          For those who aspire to live in a high cost, high tax, big government place, our nation and the world offers plenty of options. Vermont, Canada and Venezuela all offer you the opportunity to live in the socialist, big government paradise you long for. –Senator Rubio

                          Comment

                          • #508
                            Originally posted by Kidicious


                            No it is not the same group. They were given the right to use the facility by the city. The city decided to sell it. Christians bought it cheap and wouldn't sell it. Instead they demolished it.
                            So isn't their complaint with the city?

                            Would you be ranting at all if a group that you had some common views with had bought the building
                            You don't get to 300 losses without being a pretty exceptional goaltender.-- Ben Kenobi speaking of Roberto Luongo

                            Comment

                            • #509
                              Originally posted by DinoDoc
                              So there is no real obligation in your view. Only attempted violent coercion by the hooligans or punks as Pekka would say.
                              There is no legal obligation for christ sake. What is your point?
                              I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                              - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                              Comment

                              • #510
                                Originally posted by Flubber


                                So isn't their complaint with the city?

                                Would you be ranting at all if a group that you had some common views with had bought the building
                                Yes they have a complaint with the city, however they also have a complaint with the buyers which is the bigger issue.
                                I drank beer. I like beer. I still like beer. ... Do you like beer Senator?
                                - Justice Brett Kavanaugh

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 24 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 44 68 template Next
                                Working...
                                X