It looks horrendously complicated compared to the simplicity of the Western alphabets (not just Roman, but Cyrillic and Greek too) - the only thing that can trip those languages up (especially English and French) is their lack of phonetic spelling.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Two views of secularism
Collapse
X
-
THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF
Comment
-
Originally posted by Heresson
I'm sorry for my mistake. Please remember english is not my primary language.
And don't don't be intimidated by crazy aneeshm...he's stark raving bonkersSpeaking of Erith:
"It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith
Comment
-
The first one is called धर्म निरपेक्षता - which means tradition secularism, where the state does not interfere in religion, treats all religion equally, and does not allow religion to interfere with its functioning.
The second is called सर्व धर्म समभाव - which means embracing all religions, and actively participating in them and acting in their best interests (as seen by the state).
Which is the better one? Which the more sustainable? Which more practical? Which fairer?
For my evidence I refer the right honorable gentleman to the millennia of theocratic governments that started out by "embracing" religion and ended up committing mass murder in the name of God.
Comment
Comment