Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So, what should be the difference between educating smart and stupid people?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Lorizael
    Half of all children are below average


    You sure about that?
    If one child scores 100 and nine children score 10, this means the average is 19. Which means 90% are below average. I will give you the point though as these biological parameters often follow a normal distribution.

    Assuming they are referring to mean of course...
    Speaking of Erith:

    "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

    Comment


    • #17
      You'll give me the point? I'm pretty sure we're in agreement. Median is the figure where half will be beneath it, whereas with the average/mean, half might be below, but it really depends on the distribution.

      I don't understand all the confusion here. I know my math terms.
      Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
      "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

      Comment


      • #18
        According to Ron White you can't fix stupid.

        Comment


        • #19
          So all we need to do to raise most people above the average is to make one person really, really, really stupid.
          DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.

          Comment


          • #20
            We already have one
            THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
            AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
            AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
            DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Provost Harrison


              If one child scores 100 and nine children score 10, this means the average is 19. Which means 90% are below average. I will give you the point though as these biological parameters often follow a normal distribution.

              Assuming they are referring to mean of course...
              I have heard this before, I heard "48% are below average" on the news I believe when referring to mental health trusts. It tells me absolutely nothing. Is the standard generally high? Is there a huge disparity? Are most good or most bad with a few outstanding examples? They are probably more meaningful, if not numeric answers.
              Speaking of Erith:

              "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Lorizael


                Median, mode, mean - they're all the same, right?

                Huh.

                Well, according to Wikipedia, average is an ambiguous term that does not necessarily have mathematical meaning. I always thought average and mean were interchangeable.

                Still, ambiguity bad!
                The only scoring system for intelligence we have, the IQ test, is designed in such a way that all three are the same.
                12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                Stadtluft Macht Frei
                Killing it is the new killing it
                Ultima Ratio Regum

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Oncle Boris
                  The guy is a douche in many ways but one: he's right that energy (money, time or other) invested at the top brings better results.
                  The whole thing strikes me as ironic.

                  Supposedly conservative president initiates no child left behind - a sort of wealth of edcuational resources redristribution program

                  Likewise it is acknowledged that giving more to those already blessed advances society the most.

                  hmmmm....
                  "Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson

                  “In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Who said that educating gifted children in a separate stream woul cost more per child?
                    12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                    Stadtluft Macht Frei
                    Killing it is the new killing it
                    Ultima Ratio Regum

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by KrazyHorse
                      The only scoring system for intelligence we have, the IQ test, is designed in such a way that all three are the same.
                      How so?
                      Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
                      "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        What do you mean, how so?

                        IQ tests are standardised. Raw scores are retabulated "on a curve" to fit a Gaussian distribution with a mean of 100 and a SD of either 15 or 16 (depending on the test).

                        As long as the standardisation is performed correctly, then to within a very small margin of error the median and the mean are the same.
                        12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                        Stadtluft Macht Frei
                        Killing it is the new killing it
                        Ultima Ratio Regum

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                          Stadtluft Macht Frei
                          Killing it is the new killing it
                          Ultima Ratio Regum

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            How else do you think they would come up with a single number to score "intelligence"?
                            12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                            Stadtluft Macht Frei
                            Killing it is the new killing it
                            Ultima Ratio Regum

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Today's simple truth: Half of all children are below average in intelligence. We do not live in Lake Wobegon.
                              The 'Lake Wobegon Effect' is named after Garrison Keiler's mythical community where (in his words) "the women are strong, the men are good looking, and all the children are above average".

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by KrazyHorse
                                What do you mean, how so?

                                IQ tests are standardised. Raw scores are retabulated "on a curve" to fit a Gaussian distribution with a mean of 100 and a SD of either 15 or 16 (depending on the test).

                                As long as the standardisation is performed correctly, then to within a very small margin of error the median and the mean are the same.
                                That didn't take three posts. You could easily have been just as condescending in one. Anyways, thanks for the explanation.

                                I mentioned mode as well, though. Do most people have an IQ of 100?

                                Edit: Are there more people with an IQ of 100 than any other IQ? Erp. I misspoke. I've probably already been lambasted for this.
                                Last edited by Lorizael; January 19, 2007, 16:07.
                                Click here if you're having trouble sleeping.
                                "We confess our little faults to persuade people that we have no large ones." - François de La Rochefoucauld

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X