The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
So, what should be the difference between educating smart and stupid people?
If one child scores 100 and nine children score 10, this means the average is 19. Which means 90% are below average. I will give you the point though as these biological parameters often follow a normal distribution.
Assuming they are referring to mean of course...
Speaking of Erith:
"It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith
You'll give me the point? I'm pretty sure we're in agreement. Median is the figure where half will be beneath it, whereas with the average/mean, half might be below, but it really depends on the distribution.
I don't understand all the confusion here. I know my math terms.
So all we need to do to raise most people above the average is to make one person really, really, really stupid.
DISCLAIMER: the author of the above written texts does not warrant or assume any legal liability or responsibility for any offence and insult; disrespect, arrogance and related forms of demeaning behaviour; discrimination based on race, gender, age, income class, body mass, living area, political voting-record, football fan-ship and musical preference; insensitivity towards material, emotional or spiritual distress; and attempted emotional or financial black-mailing, skirt-chasing or death-threats perceived by the reader of the said written texts.
THEY!!111 OMG WTF LOL LET DA NOMADS AND TEH S3D3NTARY PEOPLA BOTH MAEK BITER AXP3REINCES
AND TEH GRAAT SINS OF THERE [DOCTRINAL] INOVATIONS BQU3ATH3D SMAL
AND!!1!11!!! LOL JUST IN CAES A DISPUTANT CALS U 2 DISPUT3 ABOUT THEYRE CLAMES
DO NOT THAN DISPUT3 ON THEM 3XCAPT BY WAY OF AN 3XTARNAL DISPUTA!!!!11!! WTF
If one child scores 100 and nine children score 10, this means the average is 19. Which means 90% are below average. I will give you the point though as these biological parameters often follow a normal distribution.
Assuming they are referring to mean of course...
I have heard this before, I heard "48% are below average" on the news I believe when referring to mental health trusts. It tells me absolutely nothing. Is the standard generally high? Is there a huge disparity? Are most good or most bad with a few outstanding examples? They are probably more meaningful, if not numeric answers.
Speaking of Erith:
"It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith
Well, according to Wikipedia, average is an ambiguous term that does not necessarily have mathematical meaning. I always thought average and mean were interchangeable.
Still, ambiguity bad!
The only scoring system for intelligence we have, the IQ test, is designed in such a way that all three are the same.
Originally posted by Oncle Boris
The guy is a douche in many ways but one: he's right that energy (money, time or other) invested at the top brings better results.
The whole thing strikes me as ironic.
Supposedly conservative president initiates no child left behind - a sort of wealth of edcuational resources redristribution program
Likewise it is acknowledged that giving more to those already blessed advances society the most.
hmmmm....
"Just puttin on the foil" - Jeff Hanson
“In a democracy, I realize you don’t need to talk to the top leader to know how the country feels. When I go to a dictatorship, I only have to talk to one person and that’s the dictator, because he speaks for all the people.” - Jimmy Carter
IQ tests are standardised. Raw scores are retabulated "on a curve" to fit a Gaussian distribution with a mean of 100 and a SD of either 15 or 16 (depending on the test).
As long as the standardisation is performed correctly, then to within a very small margin of error the median and the mean are the same.
Today's simple truth: Half of all children are below average in intelligence. We do not live in Lake Wobegon.
The 'Lake Wobegon Effect' is named after Garrison Keiler's mythical community where (in his words) "the women are strong, the men are good looking, and all the children are above average".
Originally posted by KrazyHorse
What do you mean, how so?
IQ tests are standardised. Raw scores are retabulated "on a curve" to fit a Gaussian distribution with a mean of 100 and a SD of either 15 or 16 (depending on the test).
As long as the standardisation is performed correctly, then to within a very small margin of error the median and the mean are the same.
That didn't take three posts. You could easily have been just as condescending in one. Anyways, thanks for the explanation.
I mentioned mode as well, though. Do most people have an IQ of 100?
Edit: Are there more people with an IQ of 100 than any other IQ? Erp. I misspoke. I've probably already been lambasted for this.
Comment