Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Israel plans using mini nukes to blow up Iran nuclea facilities

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    On the other hand, if I were to proven completely wrong on that count then I would wholeheartedly support Canada developing a reasonable nuclear stockpile over the next 5 years or so as a precatuionary measure, something I would not have considered otherwise.


    Where the hell is Canada going to get the money to build a nuclear stockpile? You guys won't even allocate enough money to keep your helicopters in the air...
    KH FOR OWNER!
    ASHER FOR CEO!!
    GUYNEMER FOR OT MOD!!!

    Comment


    • #77
      Re: Israel plans using mini nukes to blow up Iran nuclea facilities

      Originally posted by Brachy-Pride
      ISRAEL has drawn up secret plans to destroy Iran’s uranium enrichment facilities with tactical nuclear weapons.
      Turns out maybe they werent so secret !!!
      :LOL:
      GM of MAFIA #40 ,#41, #43, #45,#47,#49-#51,#53-#58,#61,#68,#70, #71

      Comment


      • #78
        Siro, Bible, no. But what I said flows naturally from your point that a very, very, very big convention bomb is required.
        http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

        Comment


        • #79
          And why is Iran on Isreals hit list anyway. North Korea have nukes to onow and no one planing to bomb their bunkers.

          How bout india and pakistan?

          or how bout France, Russia USA etc.


          If it ok to start planning ways to get rif of Irans stockpile we shoulds ok bombing of all Countries with Stockpiles.
          GM of MAFIA #40 ,#41, #43, #45,#47,#49-#51,#53-#58,#61,#68,#70, #71

          Comment


          • #80
            Originally posted by Rasputin
            And why is Iran on Isreals hit list anyway. North Korea have nukes to onow and no one planing to bomb their bunkers.


            Are you seriously saying that neither Japan, China, US or SK isn't making plans for bombing NK nuclear sites ? I really want to know what kind of mushrooms you are chewing - they really must be fun
            With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

            Steven Weinberg

            Comment


            • #81
              I dont think they are because they havent stopped anyone else after testing nukes.

              I think you need to get on some mushrooms so you can see he truth...
              GM of MAFIA #40 ,#41, #43, #45,#47,#49-#51,#53-#58,#61,#68,#70, #71

              Comment


              • #82
                I'd think why Israel would be more concerned by Iranian nukes than with North Koreans ones need no explanation.
                Why can't you be a non-conformist just like everybody else?

                It's no good (from an evolutionary point of view) to have the physique of Tarzan if you have the sex drive of a philosopher. -- Michael Ruse
                The Nedaverse I can accept, but not the Berzaverse. There can only be so many alternate realities. -- Elok

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
                  Where the hell is Canada going to get the money to build a nuclear stockpile?
                  Nukes are cheap when you have the experience. And we've got a fully functioning civilian and research reactor program running.

                  You can't confuse us with some pissant third world country trying to scrape together enough plutonium to make some ****ty fizzle of a nuke.

                  We spend twice as much on our military as, for instance, Israel does. And We don't need a 200 warhead arsenal like theirs. 50 would do fine.
                  12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
                  Stadtluft Macht Frei
                  Killing it is the new killing it
                  Ultima Ratio Regum

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Originally posted by Last Conformist
                    I'd think why Israel would be more concerned by Iranian nukes than with North Koreans ones need no explanation.
                    but why isnt anyone else concerned with the proliferation of coutnries adding nukes to their arsenels.
                    GM of MAFIA #40 ,#41, #43, #45,#47,#49-#51,#53-#58,#61,#68,#70, #71

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by Rasputin
                      I dont think they are because they havent stopped anyone else after testing nukes.

                      I think you need to get on some mushrooms so you can see he truth...
                      There are a big difference between planning, feeding such plans to the press, and actually doing it.

                      I'll bet that any neighbour to a country with nuclear capacity has plans stuffed away in some drawers that can be pulled out if nessecary.

                      Heck, even the canucks most certainly have some plans for how to deal with yankie nukes, though, it probably is derpressing reading material
                      With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.

                      Steven Weinberg

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        now that would be a good sight t osee..

                        Te canucks revenge
                        GM of MAFIA #40 ,#41, #43, #45,#47,#49-#51,#53-#58,#61,#68,#70, #71

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by Cort Haus

                          Nowadays, Basiji are sent not into the desert, but rather into the laboratory. Basiji students are encouraged to enroll in technical-scientific disciplines. According to a spokesperson for the Revolutionary Guard, the aim is to use the “technical factor” in order to augment “national security”.[34] But what is the implication of atomic weapons in the hands of those who interpret death in the battle field as a spiritual triumph?

                          In December 2001, then Iranian President Hashemi Rafsanjani broached this question. He explained that “the use of even one nuclear bomb inside Israel will destroy everything”. On the other hand, even in the case of a nuclear response on the part of Israel, it “will only harm the Islamic world. It is not irrational to contemplate such an eventuality.”[35] Rafsanjani thus spelled out the terms of a macabre cost-benefit analysis. It will not be possible to destroy Israel without suffering damage in turn. But for Islam the level of damage that Israel’s nuclear response could inflict is, nonetheless, bearable. Some hundred thousand or so additional martyrs for Islam – the price is not to high to pay.

                          Rafsanjani’s counting on a hundred thousand deaths might seem on first glance like a worst-case scenario. But it is not. For Rafsanjani is a representative of the “pragmatic” wing of the Iranian Revolution. In contrast to the apocalyptic wing of the Revolutionary Guard, who in 1988 wanted to pursue the war against Iraq no matter the costs, the “pragmatists” are concerned that any war should have a “worthwhile” outcome. What atomic weapons could mean in the hands of the “apocalyptic” faction is virtually unimaginable.




                          [34] Iranfocus, 12. August 2005.

                          [35] Cited in Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, "Iran Bares ,Genocidal Intent’," in: The Sun, November 3, 2005 and MEMRI, Special Dispatch Series – No. 325, January 3, 2002.


                          First of all, Rafsanjani does not, nor qould he ever, actually control the nukes. They would be in the control of the higher clerics, as advised by the military.

                          And while that sounds like fine rhetoric, in simple numbers, Tehran has more people than all of the mandate region combined.

                          This is "fine" rhetoric to use, but words are cheap. If the Iranian regime was so suicidal, why did it make peace with Saddam Hussein back in 1988? Why not martyr the whole country? Heck, a few more years of suicide waves and the Iraqis might have totally broken. Yet somehow, the Iranian regime came to a "rational" decision.

                          If Iran so wanted to create nukes to self-destroy themselves then they are certainly going about it wrong, no? They should have left the NPT long ago and rushed and invested everything to get nukes, instead of chosing a path that takes decades but eventually gives them the infrastrcuture needed to make a bomb without even needing to make one.
                          If you don't like reality, change it! me
                          "Oh no! I am bested!" Drake
                          "it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong" Voltaire
                          "Patriotism is a pernecious, psychopathic form of idiocy" George Bernard Shaw

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            GePap, they want nukes so they can openly attack Israel conventionally without fear that Israel will use nukes in defense.

                            MAD
                            http://tools.wikimedia.de/~gmaxwell/jorbis/JOrbisPlayer.php?path=John+Williams+The+Imperial+M arch+from+The+Empire+Strikes+Back.ogg&wiki=en

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              oh why oh why cant we all love eahc other !!!


                              Islamics and Jews share a common history ....
                              GM of MAFIA #40 ,#41, #43, #45,#47,#49-#51,#53-#58,#61,#68,#70, #71

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                dp
                                "A person cannot approach the divine by reaching beyond the human. To become human, is what this individual person, has been created for.” Martin Buber

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X